2022
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10054-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OSIRIS: a new code for ray tracing around compact objects

Abstract: The radiation observed in quasars and active galactic nuclei is mainly produced by a relativistic plasma orbiting close to the black hole event horizon, where strong gravitational effects are relevant. The observational data of such systems can be compared with theoretical models to infer the black hole and plasma properties. In the comparison process, ray-tracing algorithms are essential to computing the trajectories followed by the photons from the source to our telescopes. In this paper, we present : a new … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Now, it will be possible to build templates from exact General Relativistic analytical solutions, i.e. without any approximations for the orbits of stars [1][2][3], and the imaging of black holes [4,5,20]. The method shown here allows us to find solutions of the form f 1 (r, θ) = C 1 and f 2 (r, θ) = C 2 (equations (70) and (71)) which complement the standard elliptic integrals procedure handling in writing down the geodesics trajectories ( see for example references [21][22][23] ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, it will be possible to build templates from exact General Relativistic analytical solutions, i.e. without any approximations for the orbits of stars [1][2][3], and the imaging of black holes [4,5,20]. The method shown here allows us to find solutions of the form f 1 (r, θ) = C 1 and f 2 (r, θ) = C 2 (equations (70) and (71)) which complement the standard elliptic integrals procedure handling in writing down the geodesics trajectories ( see for example references [21][22][23] ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of robustness and ease of use, however, the recommended geodesic integrator is the "RK5(4)7M" method of Dormand & Prince (1980;DP), which is an adaptive fifthorder Runge-Kutta method that calculates RK4 values from the same set of function evaluations in order to estimate errors for each step. In comparing common integrators in the context of the computation of null geodesics around black holes, Velásquez-Cadavid et al (2022) find DP to be far more accurate. The step size is adjusted dynamically based on this error estimate, in order to take steps as large as possible given a user-prescribed tolerance (see Press et al 1997).…”
Section: Geodesicsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…(see James et al 2015;Pu et al 2016;Kawashima et al 2021;Velásquez-Cadavid et al 2022). It also sometimes tracks proper distance along the ray via…”
Section: Geodesicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…errors for each step. In comparing common integrators in the context of the computation of null geodesics around black holes, Velásquez-Cadavid et al (2022) find DP to be far more accurate. The step size is adjusted dynamically based on this error estimate, in order to take steps as large as possible given a user-prescribed tolerance (cf.…”
Section: Geodesicsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…(cf. James et al 2015;Pu et al 2016;Kawashima et al 2021;Velásquez-Cadavid et al 2022). It also sometimes tracks proper distance along the ray via…”
Section: Geodesicsmentioning
confidence: 99%