2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.quageo.2009.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OSL quartz age underestimation due to unstable signal components

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
79
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
79
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5, 7b). Similar differences between quartz and feldspar ages because of unstable signal components of the quartz signal were reported by Shen and Mauz (2009), Steffen et al (2009) or Tsukamoto et al (2003.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5, 7b). Similar differences between quartz and feldspar ages because of unstable signal components of the quartz signal were reported by Shen and Mauz (2009), Steffen et al (2009) or Tsukamoto et al (2003.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…8, cf. Steffen et al, 2009). The thermal instability of the signal components was crucial and therefore, we considered the OSL ages unreliable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of OSL is that the signal is known to bleach rapidly when quartz grains are exposed to light and to be stable for millions of years once shielded. However, some quartz has been unsuitable for OSL dating due to either low signal levels (Preusser et al, 2006) or signal instabilities (Steffen et al, 2009). In such contexts, feldspar IRSL often provides an alternative, although this signal is known to suffer from anomalous fading, causing age underestimation (Wintle, 1973;Huntley and Lamothe, 2001).…”
Section: Luminescence Datingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of the observations that have been made regarding the potential contribution to the initial part of the OSL decay curve from a medium decay component with a relatively short half life (Li and Li, 2006;Steffen et al, 2009), the early background (EBG) subtraction procedure (Ballarini et al, 2007;Cunningham and Wallinga, 2010) was also applied, using signal integration intervals of 0-800 ms and 800-1600 ms for signal and background respectively. The ratio of the D e values calculated using EBG and PBG subtraction was employed to screen aliquots for the presence of the medium decay component.…”
Section: Measurement and Analysis Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%