2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2019.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Osmotic Dilator Intra-Abdominal Perforation: A Case Report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, osmotic dilators are well-known cervical ripening agents with high efficiency and a small percentage of adverse effects. Their major drawbacks are the prolonged time required for cervical preparation and the need for vaginal examination with a speculum for proper application of the rod [ 84 ]. The main risks associated with using osmotic agents are pain, vasovagal reactions, allergic reactions, infection (rather when using Laminaria than synthetic dilators), and the possibility of dilator entrapment leading to intra-abdominal perforation [ 44 , 55 , 84 , 85 88 ].…”
Section: Surgical Abortionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, osmotic dilators are well-known cervical ripening agents with high efficiency and a small percentage of adverse effects. Their major drawbacks are the prolonged time required for cervical preparation and the need for vaginal examination with a speculum for proper application of the rod [ 84 ]. The main risks associated with using osmotic agents are pain, vasovagal reactions, allergic reactions, infection (rather when using Laminaria than synthetic dilators), and the possibility of dilator entrapment leading to intra-abdominal perforation [ 44 , 55 , 84 , 85 88 ].…”
Section: Surgical Abortionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their major drawbacks are the prolonged time required for cervical preparation and the need for vaginal examination with a speculum for proper application of the rod [ 84 ]. The main risks associated with using osmotic agents are pain, vasovagal reactions, allergic reactions, infection (rather when using Laminaria than synthetic dilators), and the possibility of dilator entrapment leading to intra-abdominal perforation [ 44 , 55 , 84 , 85 88 ]. Research shows that both Laminaria and misoprostol provide sufficient dilatation of the cervical canal for surgical abortion [ 87 , 88 ].…”
Section: Surgical Abortionmentioning
confidence: 99%