1960
DOI: 10.1085/jgp.44.2.315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Osmotic Flow of Water across Permeable Cellulose Membranes

Abstract: Direct measurements have been made of the net volume flow through cellulose membranes, due to a difference in concentration of solute across the membrane. The aqueous solutions used included solutes ranging in size from deuterated water to bovine serum albumin. For the semipermeable membrane (impermeable to the solute) the volume flow produced by the osmotic gradient is equal to the flow produced by the hydrostatic pressure RT AC, as given by the van't Hoff relationship. In the case in which the membrane is pe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
41
3

Year Published

1961
1961
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
41
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This limiting slope is the ratio of pore areas accessible to solute and solvent. The intercept of the asymptote at zero flow is equal to D3,(A3,/L)a, where a is the Staverman reflection factor, 1 -A.,/AW ( 11,12).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This limiting slope is the ratio of pore areas accessible to solute and solvent. The intercept of the asymptote at zero flow is equal to D3,(A3,/L)a, where a is the Staverman reflection factor, 1 -A.,/AW ( 11,12).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For non-electrolytes, Durbin (33) (34). Thus, the permeability coefficient, Po, derived from cell swelling experiments, is:…”
Section: I F L U X E S a N D P E R M E A B I L I T Y C O E F F I C mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That water can be absorbed by epithelial systems against an apparent osmotic gradient was initially explained by the proposal that there were active transport mechanisms for translocating water (Parsons & Wingate, 1961). The demonstration that the paradoxical movement of water could be effected by an intraepithelial compartment which was hypertonic to the mucosal solution as a consequence of salt transport (Curran, 1960;Durbin, 1960;Curran & McIntosh, 1962) has been a viable alternative which has received much experimental support. There is little consensus, however, on the intraepithelial locations) of the proposed hypertonic compartment and the osmotic gradients and hydraulic conductivities (LP) necessary to achieve isotonic transport (see Weinstein & Stephenson, 1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%