2016
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201603623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Osmotic Power Generation with Positively and Negatively Charged 2D Nanofluidic Membrane Pairs

Abstract: In nature, hierarchically assembled nanoscale ionic conductors, such as ion channels and ion pumps, become the structural and functional basis of bioelectric phenomena. Recently, ion‐channel‐mimetic nanofluidic systems have been built into reconstructed 2D nanomaterials for energy conversion and storage as effective as the electrogenic cells. Here, a 2D‐material‐based nanofluidic reverse electrodialysis system, containing cascading lamellar nanochannels in oppositely charged graphene oxide membrane (GOM) pairs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
346
1
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 362 publications
(371 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
10
346
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure E, when the concentration gradient is 1 to 10 3 , the power density is increasing gradually. The maximum output power value of P max is 1.6 W m −2 at a concentration gradient of 10 3 , which is comparable to some previous works …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…As shown in Figure E, when the concentration gradient is 1 to 10 3 , the power density is increasing gradually. The maximum output power value of P max is 1.6 W m −2 at a concentration gradient of 10 3 , which is comparable to some previous works …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…27 Via a mild thermal annealing process, 28 the hydrophilic GOMs can be stabilized in water or in saline for months. The thickness of the GOMs is about 15 μm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17] Therefore, the numeric pore density turns into an essential parameter. [20,21] The underlying mechanism remains unexplored in the literature. How-ever, recent experimental observations show that the commonlyused linear amplification method largely overestimates the actual performance, [18,19] compared with those experimental results obtained directly on porous materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%