2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0260-8774(00)00215-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Osmotic treatment of fish and meat products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
67
0
22

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
67
0
22
Order By: Relevance
“…and LAB, respectively, comparable with those reported in previous studies for fresh gilthead seabream and seabass fillets (Paleologos et al 2004;Tsironi et al 2009;Tsironi and Taoukis 2010). After the osmotic pretreatment, the microbial population was lowered by 0AE2-1AE3 log CFU g )1 , depending on the bacteria species, because of decontamination induced by high solute concentrations at the product ⁄ solution interface (Collignan et al 2001). These values were not significantly different for the various osmotic solutions, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Cfu Gsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and LAB, respectively, comparable with those reported in previous studies for fresh gilthead seabream and seabass fillets (Paleologos et al 2004;Tsironi et al 2009;Tsironi and Taoukis 2010). After the osmotic pretreatment, the microbial population was lowered by 0AE2-1AE3 log CFU g )1 , depending on the bacteria species, because of decontamination induced by high solute concentrations at the product ⁄ solution interface (Collignan et al 2001). These values were not significantly different for the various osmotic solutions, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Cfu Gsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…sugar, salt etc.). A driving force for water removal is set up because of a difference in osmotic pressure between the food and its surrounding solution, while the complex cellular structure of food acts as a semipermeable membrane (Torreggiani 1993;Raoult-Wack 1994;Collignan et al 2001;Rastogi et al 2002;Cath et al 2006). Lowering a w in the range 0AE97-0AE95 leads to microbial growth rate reduction and further, below a level specific to each micro-organism, to inhibition (Christian 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimated diffusion coefficient for NaCl is in agreement with the values reported for the case of turkey breast (Villacis et al 2008) and salmon muscles (Nicoletti Telis et al 2003) but higher than that reported by Mujaffar and Sankat (2006) and Gallart-Jones et al (2007), for shark fillets and salmon fillet, respectively. These differences could be explained by fish species diversity, process temperature, concentration of osmotic agent, muscle orientation, fat content and presence or absence of skin (Collignan et al 2001;Medina-Vivanco et al 2002;Gallart-Jornet et al 2007). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show that agitation promote the water expulsion (p < 0.01). According with Collignan et al (2001), the binary solution of salt and water did not need to be stirred since natural convection is enough to renew the barrier layer at the product/solution interface.…”
Section: Sensorial Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%