2022
DOI: 10.3897/phytokeys.205.82821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Osodendron gen. nov. (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae), a new genus of mimosoid legumes of tropical Africa

Abstract: The genus Osodendron is here newly described to accommodate three species and one subspecies of African mimosoid legumes. These taxa have previously been included by several authors in Albizia, Cathormion and/or Samanea, but they have been shown to be phylogenetically unrelated to any of these, being instead the sister-group of the recently described Neotropical genus Robrichia, which is similar in vegetative morphology and especially its very similar indumentum, but is decidedly different in pod morphology. A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…have long been uncertain and neglected (Fig. 11 ), also prompting further generic re-arrangement in this Special Issue by Koenen (2022a) . For the first time, the pantropical sampling employed here is more fully documenting these issues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…have long been uncertain and neglected (Fig. 11 ), also prompting further generic re-arrangement in this Special Issue by Koenen (2022a) . For the first time, the pantropical sampling employed here is more fully documenting these issues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 ), often within genera (e.g. Capuron 1970 ; Aviles et al 2022 ; Koenen 2022a ; Soares et al 2022 ) associated with hydrochory in species adapted to grow in seasonally inundated habitats and this has impacted on generic delimitation. For example, Barneby and Grimes (1996) separated their newly-segregated genera Balizia and Hydrochorea Barneby & J.W.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations