2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.06.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Osteochondroplasty Benefits the Pragmatic Patient With Femoroacetabular Impingement: Analysis From the Embedded Prospective Cohort of the Femoroacetabular Impingement RandomiSed Controlled Trial (FIRST)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eight of the 8 studies did not meet the inclusion criteria. Six studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis 22 27 (Fig. 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Eight of the 8 studies did not meet the inclusion criteria. Six studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis 22 27 (Fig. 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of six randomized clinical trials published between 2018 and 2021 were included (Table 1 ) 22 27 . A total of 839 patients were included, with 418 in the arthroscopy group and 421 in the control group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Study Characteristics. A total of six randomized clinical trials published between 2018 and 2021 were included (Table 1) [15][16][17][18][19][20] . A pool of 839 patients was included: 418 in the arthroscopy group and 421 in the control group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sexual function questionnaires used in this study (IIEF, FSFI) focus mainly on satisfaction with sexual intercourse and genital-related symptoms, but do not specifically ask about hip pain during sex. While the position aspect and hip pain during sexual intercourse may have been an avenue to explain the difference we found between osteochondroplasty patients in FIRST and EPIC, prior analysis has shown that there are no differences between FIRST and EPIC patients with respect to hip pain, hip function and health-related quality of life postoperatively [ 41 ]. We expect that the small sample size and the MD showing only a 2-point difference means this finding is likely not clinically significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%