2002
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200202000-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Osteoconductive Coatings for Total Joint Arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
152
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 256 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
4
152
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…on THR stems) to enhance bony fixation. CPC osteoconductive coatings are a well established technology in joint replacements and long term follow-ups confirm the results obtained in early works [28]. CPC are a family of compound with different in vivo behaviour depending on a number of parameters especially on Ca/P ratio the most stable being Hydroxyapatite Ca 10 (PO 4 ) 6 (OH) 2 [29].…”
Section: Calcium Phosphate Ceramicssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…on THR stems) to enhance bony fixation. CPC osteoconductive coatings are a well established technology in joint replacements and long term follow-ups confirm the results obtained in early works [28]. CPC are a family of compound with different in vivo behaviour depending on a number of parameters especially on Ca/P ratio the most stable being Hydroxyapatite Ca 10 (PO 4 ) 6 (OH) 2 [29].…”
Section: Calcium Phosphate Ceramicssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…This technique covers the bone cement with HA granules at the interface, producing a custom-made HA-coated cemented implant. Because the HA used for cementless HA-coated prostheses contains amorphous HA in part [26], this type of HA is absorbed in the years following surgery [7]. In contrast, the HA granules in our technique are pure crystal and were scarcely absorbed [4,25], suggesting the osteoconductive activity can continue indefinitely even after the onset of osteoporosis due to aging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This correlation was true for grain sizes between 7.5 and 220 μm. Particles with distorted geometries found out to be having not an impact on improvement for the retention capacity of the implants [13]. In our study first group specimen blasted with titanium oxide (TiO2) particles approximately 150 μm in diameter with a blast pressure of 4 Bar for 40 seconds.…”
Section: Implant Specimensmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…At the beginning of the study, all specimens were blasted to increase surface roughness. From recent in vivo and in vitro studies it can be easily understood that increasing surface roughness enables bone colonization on the implant which provides implant fixation [13,14]. Grit blasting method enabled proper geometries on the implant surface for tissue formation [15,16].…”
Section: Implant Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%