2019
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-018-1049-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Osteoconductive resorption characteristics of a novel biocomposite suture anchor material in rotator cuff repair

Abstract: BackgroundBioabsorbable suture anchors have been associated with bone-derived complications, such as osteolysis and cyst formation, after rotator cuff repair. The purpose of this study was to assess the osseous degradation process of the novel biocomposite suture anchor material polylactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA)/beta-tricalcium phosphate (ß-TCP)/calcium sulfate (CS) after arthroscopic single-row rotator cuff repair. The focus of interest was the appearance of osteolysis and the rate of total resorption of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the reaction surrounding the PLLA/HA polymer anchor was ''less reactive,'' because this material absorbs slower, with near complete resorption taking approximately 7 years (CITE). 22 Based on CT measurements, 74% of the Twinfix Ultra HA anchors with closed architecture had high-quality ossification compared with 60% of the Healicoil Regenesorb anchors with an open architecture. However, it is difficult to determine if the density of surrounding bone is the most appropriate outcome to measure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, the reaction surrounding the PLLA/HA polymer anchor was ''less reactive,'' because this material absorbs slower, with near complete resorption taking approximately 7 years (CITE). 22 Based on CT measurements, 74% of the Twinfix Ultra HA anchors with closed architecture had high-quality ossification compared with 60% of the Healicoil Regenesorb anchors with an open architecture. However, it is difficult to determine if the density of surrounding bone is the most appropriate outcome to measure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Vonhoegen et al 22 reported that 75% of the Regenesorb anchors could not be distinguished from bone with an MRI at a mean 21.2 months postoperatively in a retrospective clinical study. They used signal on the MRI to identify osteolysis and reported only 2 anchors with minor osteolysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A follow-up study is needed to document retear occurrence and assess when the bioabsorbable anchor would be completely absorbed. However, this may be estimated based on previously published studies [ 27 , 29 ]. Second, applying two distinct anchors into one body as the strong point of this study simultaneously acted as an obstacle in assessing the functional outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ARCR using suture anchors has become the most common procedure, and excellent clinical results have been reported. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 However, using suture anchors has certain disadvantages, such as dislocation, 5 cost, 6 , 7 osteolysis, 8 , 9 problems with revision surgery, 10 and perianchor reactions. 11 , 12 To avoid these issues, some surgeons choose transosseous ARCR techniques instead.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%