2014
DOI: 10.1017/s0022215114002278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Osteocutaneous free flaps for mandibular reconstruction: systematic review of their frequency of use and a preliminary quality of life comparison

Abstract: The flap used most frequently in the literature is the fibula free flap. Comparative quality of life data are lacking, and homogeneous populations should be used to reach significant conclusions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In dogs, reported techniques include free cortical ulnar and rib autografts with autogenous cancellous bone graft following segmental mandibulectomy, 2,3 rib allograft with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 following segmental mandibulectomy, 4 and absorbable compression resistant matrix (containing collagen, hydroxyapatite, and tricalcium phosphate soaked in recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2) following segmental mandibulectomy 5,6 and bilateral rostral mandibulectomy. 7 Common techniques used in humans for reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects include vascularized free osteocutaneous grafts, [8][9][10] particularly fibular osteocutaneous grafts, and distraction osteogenesis. 11 The increase in the availability of CT planning has resulted in advances in the management of mandibular defects in humans, including creation of 3-D models of the affected mandible for surgical planning (such as prebending and improved fitting of titanium plates, optimization of bone-to-bone contact, and shorter duration of surgery), 9,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] creation of prefabricated intraoperative guides (for optimization of the length and number of fibular grafts, improved fitting of titanium plates, and improved postoperative cosmetic appearance and function), 9,16,[19][20][21] and development of CAD-CAM customized and patientspecific 3-D-printed reconstruction plates 9,22 and prostheses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In dogs, reported techniques include free cortical ulnar and rib autografts with autogenous cancellous bone graft following segmental mandibulectomy, 2,3 rib allograft with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 following segmental mandibulectomy, 4 and absorbable compression resistant matrix (containing collagen, hydroxyapatite, and tricalcium phosphate soaked in recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2) following segmental mandibulectomy 5,6 and bilateral rostral mandibulectomy. 7 Common techniques used in humans for reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects include vascularized free osteocutaneous grafts, [8][9][10] particularly fibular osteocutaneous grafts, and distraction osteogenesis. 11 The increase in the availability of CT planning has resulted in advances in the management of mandibular defects in humans, including creation of 3-D models of the affected mandible for surgical planning (such as prebending and improved fitting of titanium plates, optimization of bone-to-bone contact, and shorter duration of surgery), 9,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] creation of prefabricated intraoperative guides (for optimization of the length and number of fibular grafts, improved fitting of titanium plates, and improved postoperative cosmetic appearance and function), 9,16,[19][20][21] and development of CAD-CAM customized and patientspecific 3-D-printed reconstruction plates 9,22 and prostheses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the different donor site options available when composite flaps are required, the fibula, iliac crest, and scapula are the most commonly used worldwide, with a fibular free flap being the first option in most cases (Massarelli, Gobbi, Biglio, Soma, & Tullio, ; Okay et al, ; Van Genechten & Batstone, ). The advantages of this flap in terms of reconstruction are well‐known; many papers on this topic have been published over the past 30 years (Aydin, Emekli, Erer, & Hafiz, ; Moubayed et al, ). Papers focusing on harvesting‐associated morbidities are relatively few in number, but nonetheless allow the assessment of long‐term, postoperative donor site outcomes—especially functionality (Baj et al, ; Feuvrier, Sagawa, Béliard, Pauchot, & Decavel, ; Li, Fang, Qi, Luo, & Sun, ; Ver Halen, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gold standard for mandibular reconstruction is universally recognised and consists of the replacement of the bony part of the mandible with a bony microvascular free flap supported by a reconstructive plate 1 - 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%