2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.02.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Osteogenic differentiation and angiogenesis with cocultured adipose-derived stromal cells and bone marrow stromal cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
68
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
68
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, we could demonstrate that conditioned media harvested from osteoporotic patient-derived ASCs was able to better support osteoporotic patient-derived BMSC osteogenesis. Although similar findings were reported in studies utilizing human ASCs with either human BMSCs or mouse osteoblastic cell lines [21,39], as far as we are aware, this is the first direct evidence that human osteoporotic ASCs have the capacity to impart a pro-osteogenic paracrine effect on human osteoporotic patientderived BMSCs in vitro. It is possible therefore, that the increases in SAMP6 trabecular bone quality following ASC treatment were due, in part, to the paracrine actions of injected ASCs on resident BMSC populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Furthermore, we could demonstrate that conditioned media harvested from osteoporotic patient-derived ASCs was able to better support osteoporotic patient-derived BMSC osteogenesis. Although similar findings were reported in studies utilizing human ASCs with either human BMSCs or mouse osteoblastic cell lines [21,39], as far as we are aware, this is the first direct evidence that human osteoporotic ASCs have the capacity to impart a pro-osteogenic paracrine effect on human osteoporotic patientderived BMSCs in vitro. It is possible therefore, that the increases in SAMP6 trabecular bone quality following ASC treatment were due, in part, to the paracrine actions of injected ASCs on resident BMSC populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…The most frequently used materials in ASCs tissue regeneration include collagen [14], hyaluronic acid [20], and polylactic-co-glycolic acid [21]. In this respect, different clinical trials are enrolling patients for the regeneration of craniofacial, cardiovascular and soft tissues [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found that epithelial cells co-cultured with SVF cells exhibited enhanced anti-inflammatory and pro-angiogenetic responses under oxidative stress conditions [24], and MSCs co-cultivated with SVF cells ameliorated the apoptosis induced by oxidative stress. Co-culture is a useful and powerful tool to understand cellular interactions and paracrine mechanisms [33], and this method can present a more comprehensive signal for differentiation to a certain lineage; however, it is very difficult to standardize in primary cells due to variation between individual donors [33]. We wondered whether SVF cells also induce the differentiation of MSCs, which are multipotent stromal cells that can differentiate into a variety of cell types.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 and 3). Because this period is very short compared with the typical time required for the in vitro osteogenic differentiation of MSCs [33-35], we could not identify a proper positive osteogenic control and used only negative controls such as mono-cultured MSCs or SVF cells in all experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%