2018
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Osteology of a forelimb of an aetosaurStagonolepis olenkae(Archosauria: Pseudosuchia: Aetosauria) from the Krasiejów locality in Poland and its probable adaptations for a scratch-digging behavior

Abstract: Aetosaurs are armored basal archosaurs that played a significant role in land ecosystems during the Late Triassic (237–201 Ma). The polish species Stagonolepis olenkae Sulej, 2010 described from the Krasiejów locality (southern Poland) is one of the oldest known representatives of the group. Abundant and well-preserved material, including partially articulated specimens, allows a detailed description of the forelimbs in this species. The forelimbs of S. olenkae are the most similar to that of large aetosaurs l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(118 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several osteological features of aetosaurs have been considered as diet informative, such as the edentulous anterior premaxilla and dentary and the shovel-shaped premaxillary tip (Parrish, 1994;Small, 2002;Figure 23H) present in A. scagliai. These features have been interpreted as useful for "digging or grubbing amongst soft vegetation" (Walker, 1961, p. 193), congruent with the idea that aetosaurs used their limbs to dig (Walker, 1961;Heckert and Lucas, 2010;Dróżdż, 2018). Desojo and Vizcaíno (2009) observed disparity in biomechanical aspects of the mandible of some aetosaurs, including the placement of the glenoid (Figure 23J-K).…”
Section: Aetosaur Diet and Paleobiologymentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Several osteological features of aetosaurs have been considered as diet informative, such as the edentulous anterior premaxilla and dentary and the shovel-shaped premaxillary tip (Parrish, 1994;Small, 2002;Figure 23H) present in A. scagliai. These features have been interpreted as useful for "digging or grubbing amongst soft vegetation" (Walker, 1961, p. 193), congruent with the idea that aetosaurs used their limbs to dig (Walker, 1961;Heckert and Lucas, 2010;Dróżdż, 2018). Desojo and Vizcaíno (2009) observed disparity in biomechanical aspects of the mandible of some aetosaurs, including the placement of the glenoid (Figure 23J-K).…”
Section: Aetosaur Diet and Paleobiologymentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The distal articular surface is convex with a shallow longitudinal groove on the posterior edge as in P. kirkpatricki (e.g., TTU P‐9002) and H. agilis (AMNH FR 6758; Nesbitt, 2011). This distal groove does not appear to be present in aetosaurs, at least not in S. olenkae for which the forelimb is well documented (Dróżdż, 2018).…”
Section: Osteological Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The complete right ulna of PEFO 34561 (Figures 9i–l) is 84% of the length of the humerus. The proximal end is mediolaterally expanded as in aetosaurs (e.g., T. coccinarum , AMNH FR 2713; S. olenkae ; Parker, 2013; Dróżdż, 2018), not compressed as in phytosaurs (Long & Murry, 1995), and bears a well‐developed proximally expanded olecranon process (Figures 9i, k). The olecranon has a mediolaterally broad dorsal process separated by a “sigmoid notch” (Brochu, 1992) from the more mediolaterally constricted anterior process.…”
Section: Osteological Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…modern birds). These characteristics rule out the majority of the animals known from the body fossil record of the locality as producers (the aetosaur S. olenkae was probably an omnivorous/herbivorous scratch digger too large for solely targeting small beetles [35]; the phytosaur and temnospondyls show clear adaptations to piscivory; the large carnivorous rauisuchian P. silesiacus was too large and the majority of the other reptiles, as lepidosauromorphs or small archosauromorphs were too small to produce such large faeces) but fit well with the dinosauriform S. opolensis (estimated body weight 15 kg), which is known from numerous body fossils in the same fossiliferous interval [30,36]. Silesaurus opolensis possesses anatomical characters which are more similar to those of birds rather than other basal dinosaurs.…”
Section: Coprolitesmentioning
confidence: 99%