1930
DOI: 10.1177/003591573002300451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Osteoma of the Frontal Sinus. Operation for Removal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1941
1941
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[612] The frontal-ethmoidal sinus is the most frequent site in the paranasal sinuses and even so majority of these are micro lesions averaging about 5 mm in size and hence are usually asymptomatic. [351214] Larger lesions, those up to 30 mm in diameter, are still more infrequent, but are more wont to be symptomatic by causing varying nasal/paranasal sinus inflammatory/infective and obstructive symptoms, and occasional intracranial/orbital complications. [2467131417] Surgical resection is then called for and many of these less than 30 mm lesions are safely excised via sundry minimally invasive techniques including external fronto-ethmoidectomy and even endoscopic endonasal methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[612] The frontal-ethmoidal sinus is the most frequent site in the paranasal sinuses and even so majority of these are micro lesions averaging about 5 mm in size and hence are usually asymptomatic. [351214] Larger lesions, those up to 30 mm in diameter, are still more infrequent, but are more wont to be symptomatic by causing varying nasal/paranasal sinus inflammatory/infective and obstructive symptoms, and occasional intracranial/orbital complications. [2467131417] Surgical resection is then called for and many of these less than 30 mm lesions are safely excised via sundry minimally invasive techniques including external fronto-ethmoidectomy and even endoscopic endonasal methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before the advent of the roentgen ray, it was considered extremely rare, but in recent years some authors have expressed the opinion that it was fairly common. The great majority of reports have been of single cases, there being only twenty reports with 2 (Home, 1799;Lambì, 1857;Arnold, 1873;Hutchinson, 1888;Kikusi, 1888;Mitvalsky, 1894;Hamilton, 1901;Manasse, 1910;Boardman and Donovan, 1918;Harper, 1927;Fröding, 1929;Sackin, 1929;Birch-Hirschfeld, 1930;Brown, 1930;Armitage, 1931;Carmody, 1932;Roger, 1932;Neumann, 1934;Matolcsy, 1936, anddi Marzio, 1936), six with 3 cases (MacKenzie, 1854; Mackenty, 1924;Claus, 1927;Harris, 1928;Fetissof, 1929, andCausse, 1934), one with 4 cases (Carmody, 1935), one with 6 (Coppez, 1895), one with 9 cases (Childrey, 1939) and one with 30 cases (Sattler, 1938 (1934), 134 cases; Carmody (1935), 103 cases; Gatewood and Settel (1935), 147 cases, and Malan (1938), 178 cases. Faulkner (1924) stated that in twenty years at the last-named institution he had seen but 3 cases of osteoma of the frontal sinus.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%