2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.11.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Osteometric sex estimation from the os coxa in a Thai population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with previous studies, pelvic height [e.g. 22,54,55] and the subpubic angle [e.g. 14,50,56,57] appear as some of the most dimorphic variables in the models enacted by CADOES.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In agreement with previous studies, pelvic height [e.g. 22,54,55] and the subpubic angle [e.g. 14,50,56,57] appear as some of the most dimorphic variables in the models enacted by CADOES.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…To mitigate such problem, pelvis fragments and single bone measurements can be used for sex estimation, since the model generator can produce estimates with as few as two variables. In fact, univariable models are to be avoided as they usually are less accurate and more biased [22,50,64,65] and the number of variables required to yield the most accurate models generally range from two to eleven variables [54]. Another limitation is that metric methods are apparently population specific and tend to perform better within populations of similar height or general body proportions, since size in itself correlates more to these features than to sexual dimorphism [55,66,67].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Population-specific discriminant function and logistic regression equations for estimation of sex have been formulated from measurements of the skull [4][5][6][7][8][9] , pectoral girdle [10][11][12][13][14][15] , sternum [16][17][18][19][20][21] , pelvis [22][23][24] , hand and foot bones [25][26][27][28][29][30] with various degrees of accuracies. In addition, several studies have shown the usefulness of intact long bones of upper and lower limbs 13,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] for sex prediction in different parts of the world.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is crucial to derive the population-specific reference data in each population to increase the accuracy of sex estimation. In Thailand, although several studies have been reported in sex estimation using Thai skeletal remains, such as humerus [4], cranial and appendicular bones [13], sternum [14], vertebral column [15], radius [16], calcaneus [17,18], mastoid process [19], metacarpal bone [20], iliac bone [21], proximal hand phalange [22], talus [23], navicular bone [24], skull [25], sternum [26], maxillary suture [27], scapula [28], and os coxa [29]. However, studies of sex estimation from fragmented upper limb bones have rarely been published.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%