Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment for Temporomandibular Disorders

Easterbrook, Simone; Keys, Jordan; Talsma, Joel; Pierce-Talsma, Stacey

doi:10.7556/jaoa.2019.071

Cited by 7 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Cerritelli et al, 2015 [30] A 3-armed randomized controlled trial (OMT + medical therapy vs. sham + medical therapy vs. medical therapy) Biondi, 2005 [29] Review about chiropractic, osteopathic, physical therapy, or massage interventions Facial pain Detoni et al, 2022 [31] Randomized controlled study about OMT vs. molar shim Temporo-mandibular joint dysfunction (TJD) Easterbrook et al, 2019 [32] Commentary with video to show osteopathic approach Lancaster and Crow, 2006 [33] Case report Bell's paralysis Volokitin et al, 2020 [34] Case report Karp et al, 2019 [35] Retrospective case review about facial rehabilitation Facial nerve dysfunctions (and other conditions related to exocranial nerve dysfunction) Khan et al, 2022 [36] Systematic review about massage, exercise, and facial rehabilitation…”

Section: Headache and Migrainementioning

confidence: 99%

Neurophysiology, Neuro-Immune Interactions, and Mechanobiology in Osteopathy in the Cranial Field: An Evidence-Informed Perspective for a Scientific Rationale

Barsotti,

Casini,

Chiera

et al. 2023

Healthcare

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

(1) Background: Osteopathy in the cranial field (OCF) is a distinctive approach within osteopathy, focusing on the cranial region’s manual manipulation. Nevertheless, OCF fosters doubt in the scientific community because it refers to out-of-date models. This perspective paper critically analyzes the current knowledge in the fields of neurophysiology and mechanobiology to propose an evidence-informed rationale for OCF. (2) Methods: The reporting framework used in the current perspective article obeyed the guidelines for writing a commentary. (3) Results: The article’s main findings focus on the tactile stimulation of exocranial receptors and their implications in the management of craniofacial algic-dysfunctional syndromes implementing OCF. (4) Conclusions: By establishing an evidence-based rationale for OCF, this research aims to guide future directions in OCF and contribute to a more patient-centered and effective approach to health and wellbeing.

show abstract

Section: Headache and Migrainementioning

confidence: 99%

Neurophysiology, Neuro-Immune Interactions, and Mechanobiology in Osteopathy in the Cranial Field: An Evidence-Informed Perspective for a Scientific Rationale

Barsotti,

Casini,

Chiera

et al. 2023

Healthcare

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Традиційно передбачається, що клінічні випадки повинні завершуватися оклюзійними співвідношеннями I класу для досягнення взаємнозахищеної СУЧАСНА СТОМАТОЛОГІЯ 4/2023 оклюзії. Разом з тим, часто СНР спостерігається і у пацієнтів з ортогнатичним прикусом [67,68]. Результати досліджень свідчать про те, що саме ортогнатичний прикус переважає у пацієнтів з скронево-нижньощелепними розладами, в 80% з яких порушення оклюзії відсутні [69].…”

Section: актуальністьunclassified

Occlusion and temporomandibular disorders

Semchyshyn

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary. Clinicians and researchers have considered occlusion as one of the main direct and/or indirect etiological factor that cause temporomandibular disorders (TMD) for many years. The relationship between occlusion and TMD (temporomandibular disorders) has been based on the observation of an anatomical relationship between tooth position and jaw function for a long time, as well as on the higher prevalence of TMD in people with malocclusion compared to the general population. A significant number of studies have examined factors associated with occlusion and malocclusion as a potential mechanism for the development of signs or symptoms of TMD. At the same time, there are other concepts for the development of TMJ pathology. Aim of the research: to analyze modern views on the etiological factors of temporomandibular disorders according to the latest sources of scientific and medical information. Recent scientific trends have shifted the focus of TMD etiology from biomedical to a more complex multi-factor biopsychosocial model that includes biological, psychological, and social factors. Therefore, a proper understanding of the relationship between «occlusion» and SNA seems extremely important, since a paradigm shift requires a more comprehensive interpretation of the concepts of occlusion and maxillary relationships. The role of malocclusion in the etiology of temporomandibular disorders should be considered limited, unless a causal relationship is proven. Instead, clinicians should pay serious attention to patients «occlusal awareness» and concerns during general and dental consultations, as some patient groups may develop iatrogenic maladaptive behavior. Key words: temporomandibular joint, temporomandibular disorders, occlusion, malocclusion, splint therapy, prosthetic and orthodontic treatment.

show abstract

“…Since then, the diagnostic criteria have been updated, and the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) were published in 2014. The DC/TMD is a comprehensive, standardized diagnostic tool that includes both an Axis I and an Axis II evaluation [ 4 – 13 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Accuracy of temporomandibular disorders diagnosis evaluated through the diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorder (DC/TDM) Axis II compared to the Axis I evaluations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Minervini,

Marrapodi,

Siurkel

et al. 2024

BMC Oral Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is a complex joint that facilitates mandibular movements during speech, chewing, and swallowing activities. The Axis I evaluation of the DC/TMD focuses on assessing physical diagnoses related to TMDs. It includes an assessment of pain and functional limitations, such as jaw opening range, joint sounds, and joint tenderness. The Axis II evaluation of the DC/TMD provides information on the patient’s psychological status and quality of life. This Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis aimed to evaluate the accuracy of Temporomandibular Disorders diagnosis considered through the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorder (DC/TDM) axis II compared to the Axis I evaluations. Methods A search was made in PubMed, Web of Science and Lilacs for articles published from the inception until 20 January 2023. We applied the Population, Exposure, Comparator, and Outcomes (PECO) model [1] to assess document eligibility. Only studies that evaluated patients by DC/TMD Axis I and Axis II were considered. Review Manager version 5.2.8 (Cochrane Collaboration) was used for the pooled analysis. We measured the odds ratio (OR) between the two groups (Axis I and Axis II). Results Fifty-one articles were selected because of the search. Four papers were excluded before the screening: 2 pieces were not in English, and two were reviewed. The remaining 47 articles were selected for the title and abstract screening to evaluate whether they met the PECO criteria. Among these, four papers were established; the overall effect showed that there was no difference in TMD diagnosis between Axis I and Axis II (RR 1.17; 95% CI: 0.80– 1.71; Z:0.82; P = .41), suggesting that there is no difference between Axis I and Axis II. Conclusion In conclusion, DC/TMD is an effective tool for the diagnosis of TMD. It improves the accuracy of TMD diagnosis, allows for the classification of subtypes, and assesses psychosocial factors that may impact the development or maintenance of TMD symptoms.

show abstract

Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment for Temporomandibular Disorders

Cited by 7 publications

References 5 publications

Neurophysiology, Neuro-Immune Interactions, and Mechanobiology in Osteopathy in the Cranial Field: An Evidence-Informed Perspective for a Scientific Rationale

Neurophysiology, Neuro-Immune Interactions, and Mechanobiology in Osteopathy in the Cranial Field: An Evidence-Informed Perspective for a Scientific Rationale

Occlusion and temporomandibular disorders

Accuracy of temporomandibular disorders diagnosis evaluated through the diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorder (DC/TDM) Axis II compared to the Axis I evaluations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About