2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgg.2015.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Osteoporosis: A Silent Disease with Complex Genetic Contribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the most prominent study to date, a meta-analysis conducted by Estrada et al (2012), identified 56 loci associated with BMD, osteoporosis and/or fracture that accounted for ~ 6% of the variation in BMD. Overall, more than 66 genetic loci have been associated with (DXA derived) BMD via GWAS method, as well as many others through candidate gene association studies, and this number continues to increase, emphasising the extremely polygenic nature of BMD (Golchin et al 2016). A further 153 loci have been associated with BMD estimated by quantitative ultrasound of the heel (Kemp et al 2017).…”
Section: Genetic Association With Bmdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the most prominent study to date, a meta-analysis conducted by Estrada et al (2012), identified 56 loci associated with BMD, osteoporosis and/or fracture that accounted for ~ 6% of the variation in BMD. Overall, more than 66 genetic loci have been associated with (DXA derived) BMD via GWAS method, as well as many others through candidate gene association studies, and this number continues to increase, emphasising the extremely polygenic nature of BMD (Golchin et al 2016). A further 153 loci have been associated with BMD estimated by quantitative ultrasound of the heel (Kemp et al 2017).…”
Section: Genetic Association With Bmdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite the fact that the pathogenetic mechanisms of this disease were intensively investigated, factors that contribute to the development of osteoporosis are rather complicated and yet need to be further defined. Recently, accumulating evidence suggested that, besides individual lifestyle and environmental factors, certain genetic factors may be relevant to the development of osteoporosis . Furthermore, twin and family studies also demonstrated that genetic influences accounted for 70% of individual variances in bone mineral density (BMD), the major determinant of fracture risk .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,16 It is widely accepted that dysregulation of osteogenesis-related genes is responsible for the poor healing performance of bone injury in T2DM, osteoporosis, or other systemic diseases patients. [17][18][19] In this regard, certain osteogenesis-related miRNAs would be expected to be involved, while very little work has been done in this field, especially in the context of bone regeneration and oral implantation. It has been reported that miR204 acts as a negative regulator during BMSC osteogenic differentiation by directly repressing runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2), 20 a key transcription factor in osteogenesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%