2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.03.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Osteoradionecrosis of the mandible: A ten year single-center retrospective study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
49
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(113 reference statements)
2
49
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Oh et al demonstrated that patients who continued smoking or alcohol use are at risk of failing conservative management and are more prone to having a surgical intervention [17]. A recent study by Chronopoulos et al showed that patients who continued smoking or alcohol use were more likely to develop a severe grade of ORN [19]. In our study 75% of patients with ORN still continued alcohol use and 25% continued smoking.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 46%
“…Oh et al demonstrated that patients who continued smoking or alcohol use are at risk of failing conservative management and are more prone to having a surgical intervention [17]. A recent study by Chronopoulos et al showed that patients who continued smoking or alcohol use were more likely to develop a severe grade of ORN [19]. In our study 75% of patients with ORN still continued alcohol use and 25% continued smoking.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 46%
“…In the current study, we examined patients with OPC, a group who are routinely treated with definitive RT with or without systemic therapy at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. 14,20 Smoking is associated with poor oral hygiene, but may decrease oxygenation of tissues and affect the healing process of the acute damage and vascular disorders occurring throughout RT. Patients requiring mandibulotomies or mandibulectomies have been reported to have a higher risk of bone necrosis after RT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because interventions (including sequestration, medical interventions, HBO, and surgery) were applied based on the duration and extent of ORN, these interventions in combination with clinical and radiographic information provide a consistent estimate of severity, which is the purpose of a grading schema. In other publications, a large variety of grading guidelines have been used, including the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, 6,11,13,18 the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, 9,12,19 Schwartz and Kagan grading, 7,8 the grading system of Glanzmann and Graetz 3,10 the grading guidelines of Tsai et al 14 Lyons et al, 19 Notani et al's, 20 the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria, 18 and the Late Effects of Normal Tissues Task Force/Subjective, Objective, Management, Analytic (LENT/SOMA) scale. 16 However, in some publications, the grading system is not mentioned.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the aforementioned reasons, we set the cut-off for the radiation dose at 80 Gy and performed further analysis. Controversy persists among investigations as to whether the radiation dose is directly proportional to the development or severity of ORNM 18, 2022 ; nevertheless, no coherent conclusion has been drawn because the distinct grading system used in previous investigations made comparison baseless and meaningless. Mucke et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%