Background
Head and neck osteosarcoma is a comparatively rare and aggressive malignancy. Our goal was to examine the experience of head and neck osteosarcoma patients seen over a 15‐year period at the University of Washington Medical Center and compare this with the published experience of other centers in terms of demographics, histology, treatment, and survival rate.
Methods
We reviewed surgical pathology slides and clinical treatment records of 13 patients who were treated at the University of Washington Medical Center between 1981 and 1996. A total of 17 cases from 13 patients (13 primary tumors and 4 recurrences) were studied.
Results
There was a slight male predominance, with a male:female ratio of 1.6:1, and median age at diagnosis of 40.9 years (range 22 to 75 years), both slightly higher than has been generally reported. Three of 13 patients had recognized risk factors for the development of osteosarcoma: 2 with a history of prior radiotherapy and 1 with Paget's disease. All surgical pathology specimens were examined independently by two pathologists for histologic grading and typing. At initial presentation, 9/13 (69%) cases had conventional (osteoblastic) histology; 2/13 (15%) were fibroblastic, 1 chondroblastic (8%) and 1 parosteal (8%). Eight of 13 (62%) cases were high grade at initial presentation. Four of 13 (30%) of the primary tumors were low grade, 2 of which did not recur over a median follow‐up period of 24 months. The other 2 low‐grade tumors later recurred locally, as high‐grade osteosarcomas, after disease‐free intervals of 1 year and 14 years, respectively. One patient had an intermediate‐grade tumor which has not recurred as of last follow‐up. Combined‐modality treatment, including surgery with or without radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, was given depending on the histologic grade, surgical margins, and recurrence. Some patients with low‐grade tumors had surgery only. There were 5 local recurrences, 1 of these following a disease‐free interval of 14 years. One patient had 3 separate recurrences at the same site. Ten of 13 (77%) are alive and disease‐free. Of the 3 deaths, 1 was related to radiation‐induced brain necrosis, without evidence of recurrent tumor. The projected 5‐year overall survival in this series is 72%, with a mean follow‐up of 58 months (median, 36 months). Of those receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 6/7 have survived to the present.
Conclusion
Given the limitations of a small patient population, our data suggest that neoadjuvant chemotherapy may provide benefit in terms of survival. Longer follow‐up will be necessary to support this conclusion. Our data also show that our population has a higher‐than‐average age of onset, low presence of risk factors, and better survival rate in comparison with the published series from other institutions. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Head Neck 19:513–523, 1997.