2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3462648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ostrom Amongst the Machines: Blockchain as a Knowledge Commons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These techno-determinist perspectives are not new, nor a particular issue for blockchain technologies: they resemble, for example, the techno-determinist discourses during the popularization of access to the internet in the 1990s (Wellman et al, 2006). Still, they seem to be reinvigorated from the multiple scenarios that blockchain technology brings, as an exemplification of Hayek-like libertarian views (Bodon et al, 2019).…”
Section: Potentials Of Blockchain For Commons Governancementioning
confidence: 98%
“…These techno-determinist perspectives are not new, nor a particular issue for blockchain technologies: they resemble, for example, the techno-determinist discourses during the popularization of access to the internet in the 1990s (Wellman et al, 2006). Still, they seem to be reinvigorated from the multiple scenarios that blockchain technology brings, as an exemplification of Hayek-like libertarian views (Bodon et al, 2019).…”
Section: Potentials Of Blockchain For Commons Governancementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Technological spaces can also be thought of as a commons in the sense that challenges arise from the sheer number of users (Bustamante et al, 2020; Harris, 2018). Blockchain also has a feature of a commons, with its success reflecting the ability of its users to develop rules, procedures, and processes for resolving disputes, as well as processes for establishing boundaries, including excludability, which is a central governance feature of permissioned blockchains (Bodon et al, 2022). Law remains significant, including aspects of contract law, tort law, and property law (Werbach, 2018).…”
Section: Blockchains and Their Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These ideas have been closely examined and found broadly prospective, such as in governing blockchain dispute resolution (e.g., see Allen, Lane, & Poblet, 2020;Howell & Potgieter, 2021). Moreover, some DAO governance analyses (e.g., Bodon et al, 2019;Buterin, 2022;Buterin et al, 2019;Howell & Potgieter, 2021;Murtazashvili et al, 2022;Rozas et al, 2021) draw heavily on Ostrom's (1990) 'governing the commons' model of rules, as well as the broader IAD framework (Ostrom, 2005(Ostrom, , 2010.…”
Section: Blockchains Without Romancementioning
confidence: 99%