Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2016) 2016
DOI: 10.18653/v1/s16-1189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OSU_CHGCG at SemEval-2016 Task 9 : Chinese Semantic Dependency Parsing with Generalized Categorial Grammar

Abstract: This paper introduces our Chinese semantic dependency parsing system for Task 9 of Se-mEval 2016. Our system has two components: a parser trained using the Berkeley Grammar Trainer on the Penn Chinese Treebank reannotated in a Generalized Categorial Grammar, and a multinomial logistic regression classifier. We first parse the data with the automatic parser to obtain predicate-argument dependencies and then we use the classifier to predict the semantic dependency labels for the predicate-argument dependency rel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An obvious challenge for such a project is the fact that current parsers are not good at reliably identifying fine-grained linguistic information such as the position of the gap in a relative clause. However, research on improving the accuracy of machine annotation for fine-grained, linguistically relevant information is rapidly in progress (see, e.g., Duan et al (2016)), so, the future prospects for this type of work do not seem totally gloom.…”
Section: Linguistic Implications Of the Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An obvious challenge for such a project is the fact that current parsers are not good at reliably identifying fine-grained linguistic information such as the position of the gap in a relative clause. However, research on improving the accuracy of machine annotation for fine-grained, linguistically relevant information is rapidly in progress (see, e.g., Duan et al (2016)), so, the future prospects for this type of work do not seem totally gloom.…”
Section: Linguistic Implications Of the Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%