2021
DOI: 10.3390/app11188601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OT-Equator® Attachments Comparison for Retaining an Early Loaded Implant Overdenture on Two or Three Implants: 1 Year RCT Preliminary Data

Abstract: The purpose of this multicenter randomized controlled trial was to compare the clinical, radiographic, and patient-centered outcomes of early loaded mandibular overdentures deliberately placed on two or three implants. The outcomes were: implant and prosthesis success and survival rates; biological and technical complications; marginal bone loss; patient satisfaction; and periodontal parameters. The results showed no differences between the groups in any of the outcomes analyzed. With the limitations of the pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This condition allows patients to avoid and considerably limit the number of implants necessary for the retention of the prosthesis, a favorable condition in light of the levels of greater tissue inflammation resulting from implant placement, and increase the inter-implant distance, a favorable condition for implant survival [12][13][14][15]. In addition to the reduced number of implants that can be used in this type of rehabilitation, it is also necessary to consider the type of attachments used in this study and the different alternatives findable in the market that certainly offer different biomechanical solutions [16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This condition allows patients to avoid and considerably limit the number of implants necessary for the retention of the prosthesis, a favorable condition in light of the levels of greater tissue inflammation resulting from implant placement, and increase the inter-implant distance, a favorable condition for implant survival [12][13][14][15]. In addition to the reduced number of implants that can be used in this type of rehabilitation, it is also necessary to consider the type of attachments used in this study and the different alternatives findable in the market that certainly offer different biomechanical solutions [16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further investigation should be conducted to evaluate the performance of attachment systems in case of the immediate loading procedure [21], also assessing risks and benefts, including patients' satisfaction. Another study [22] presents a randomised controlled trial comparing the outcomes of two-implant-and three-implant-supported overdentures for edentulous mandibles. Te study evaluated implant and prosthetic success rates, complications, marginal bone loss, patient satisfaction, and peri-implant tissue health.…”
Section: Successmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solitary and bar-type attachments are available for dental implant overdentures [ 19 ]. Solitary attachments, such as balls, magnets, locators, and OT Equators, are easier to maintain and can be used in limited inter-arch spaces, while bars provide more stability to overdentures [ 20 , 21 ]. Usually, each attachment system has two components, one is embedded within the denture base while the other is screwed to the implant [ 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%