1975
DOI: 10.2307/1914280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Other Solutions to Nash's Bargaining Problem

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. The Econometric Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Econometrica.A two-person bargaining problem is considered. It is shown that und… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
703
3
8

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,494 publications
(740 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
5
703
3
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Substituting (4) in (3) optimally Therefore, (8) states that, in CE terms, the consumption that our equilibrium allocates to agent i at date t consists of what he already owns and the sum of gains from (optimal) trade when he makes offers in the future. Equation (8) is similar to (5 KalaiSmorodinsky (1975). Roth (1985) shows that Given any (Pareto-optimal and individually rational 10…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Substituting (4) in (3) optimally Therefore, (8) states that, in CE terms, the consumption that our equilibrium allocates to agent i at date t consists of what he already owns and the sum of gains from (optimal) trade when he makes offers in the future. Equation (8) is similar to (5 KalaiSmorodinsky (1975). Roth (1985) shows that Given any (Pareto-optimal and individually rational 10…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Therefore, some researchers have studied multi-issue negotiations using issue by issue negotiation and analyze when this simplification is applicable (e.g., (Luo et al 2003)). In cooperative game theory, Nash and others ((Nash 1951), (Nash 1953), (Luce and Raiffa 1989), (Kalai and Smorodinsky 1975) and (Ponsati and Watson 1997)) have focused on designing appropriate axioms that characterize the negotiation solution.…”
Section: Formal Negotiation Research: Different Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bargaining models of marriage have emphasized Nash bargaining and neglected other cooperative bargaining models and solution concepts. For example, although Manser and Brown considered both the Nash and the Kalai-Smorodinsky (1975) bargaining solutions, subsequent work on bargaining in families has virtually ignored KalaiSmorodinsky. Gugl (2004) provides an interesting exception, considering both the Nash and Kalai-Smorodinsky bargaining solutions.…”
Section: A O II a Noncooperative Repeated Voluntary Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%