BackgroundThe 2017 and 2018 wildfire seasons in British Columbia (BC), Canada were unprecedented. Among all the pollutants in wildfire smoke, fine particulate matter (PM2.5) poses the most significant risk to human health. There is limited research on prenatal wildfire-related PM2.5exposure and its impacts on infant health.ObjectivesWe assessed the effect of prenatal wildfire-related PM2.5exposure on respiratory infections in the first year of life. We explored exposure windows based on prenatal respiratory tract development and gestational trimester.MethodsAll live singleton infantsin uteroduring the wildfire seasons (July to September) from 2016 to 2019 were identified using the BC Perinatal Data Registry (BCPDR). The Canadian Optimized Statistical Smoke Exposure Model (CanOSSEM) was used to estimate daily PM2.5exposures throughout pregnancy and the first year of life. Infants who were diagnosed with otitis media or a lower respiratory infection by age 1 year were identified, including infections associated with dispensations of the antibiotic amoxicillin. The odds ratios (OR) for exposures during specific developmental windows and gestational trimesters were estimated with logistic regression, conditioned on epidemiologic week of birth to control for seasonal trends. Analyses were adjusted for multiple environmental and individual-level covariates.ResultsThere were 134,475 infants included in the cohort, of which 22,093 were diagnosed with at least one outcome of interest. For every 10 μg/m3increase in wildfire-related PM2.5, the OR [95% confidence interval] for otitis media associated with the fourth window of eustachian tube development (weeks 19-28) was 1.08 [1.02, 1.16]. Results were similar for infections associated with amoxicillin dispensations and during the second trimester (weeks 14-27) of development. Similarly, the canalicular stage of lower respiratory tract development (weeks 18-27) and the second trimester were associated with increased odds of lower respiratory tract infections.ConclusionSpecific windows of prenatal exposure to wildfire-related PM2.5during the second trimester were associated with increased odds of otitis media and lower respiratory infections by age 1 year.SynopsisStudy questionsIs prenatal exposure to wildfire-related PM2.5associated with risk of respiratory infections in the first year of life? If so, what are the critical prenatal exposure windows?What’s already knownFew studies have focused on prenatal exposure to wildfire-related PM2.5and respiratory outcomes in the very early stages of life, nor the critical windows for gestational exposures. Evidence suggests that wildfire-related PM2.5may impact the foetus directly or indirectly, potentially leading to adverse consequences for foetal respiratory tract development and vulnerability of the respiratory system in early life.What this study addsPrenatal exposure to wildfire-related PM2.5during specific periods of respiratory tract development were associated with increased risk of otitis media and lower respiratory infections by age 1 year. Results were similar for all infections and those associated with antibiotic dispensations. This study suggests that wildfire-related PM2.5exposure during specific developmental windows can affect respiratory health in early life. Public health practitioners and healthcare providers should work to protect pregnant people and their children from the detrimental effects of wildfire smoke.
