2016
DOI: 10.1007/s13358-016-0120-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Otoliths in situ from Sarmatian (Middle Miocene) fishes of the Paratethys. Part III: tales from the cradle of the Ponto-Caspian gobies

Abstract: Articulated fossil fish skeletons with otoliths in situ provide a unique opportunity to link these two, otherwise independent data sets of skeletons and otoliths. They provide calibration points for otoliths also adding important information for the evolutionary interpretation of fishes. Here, we review nine articulated skeletons of gobies from the early Sarmatian of Dolje, Croatia, and Belgrade, Serbia, which were previously regarded as members of a single gobiid and a callionymid species. We found them to re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
30
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other coeval otolith associations stem from marine or restricted marine environments, e.g., Weiler (1943), Pobedina (1954), Strashimirov (1984Strashimirov ( , 1985, and Djafarova (2006). The same is true for fish faunas based on articulated skeletons, sometimes with otoliths in situ, e.g., Carnevale et al (2006), Bannikov (2010), Bannikov and Kotlyar (2015), Schwarzhans et al (2017aSchwarzhans et al ( , 2017bSchwarzhans et al ( , 2017c.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Other coeval otolith associations stem from marine or restricted marine environments, e.g., Weiler (1943), Pobedina (1954), Strashimirov (1984Strashimirov ( , 1985, and Djafarova (2006). The same is true for fish faunas based on articulated skeletons, sometimes with otoliths in situ, e.g., Carnevale et al (2006), Bannikov (2010), Bannikov and Kotlyar (2015), Schwarzhans et al (2017aSchwarzhans et al ( , 2017bSchwarzhans et al ( , 2017c.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Neogobius bettinae differs from N. rhachis by the low anterodorsal angle and curved dorsal rim (vs. rather flat). Both species occur together in Mykhailivka, indicating an already advanced speciation of the genus in the Ponto-Caspian Basin, possibly including extinct lineages (see also Schwarzhans et al, 2017c). Rückert-Ülkümen, 1993in Rückert-Ülkümen et al, 1993Figure 4.10-19 1993 Neogobius rhachis n.…”
Section: Materialmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The only reliable records of 'sand goby' skeletons seem to be Pomatoschistus sp. (with otoliths in situ) from the upper Miocene of the North Caucasus (Russia) described in Carnevale et al (2006) and the species described in Schwarzhans et al (2017) from the middle Miocene (Sarmatian) of the Central Paratethys (Croatia). Besides, there are some otolith-based species of the 'sand gobies' from the middle Miocene (see Weiler, 1943;Wienrich et al, 2009;Schwarzhans, 2010Schwarzhans, , 2014Bratishko et al, 2015;Schwarzhans et al, 2015;Schwarzhans et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We constructed a 50% majority‐rule consensus tree, trimmed the hypothesis to two exemplars of each species (three for widespread P. marmoratus ), and then calibrated the phylogeny using BEAST 1.7.5 (Drummond, Suchard, Xie, & Rambaut, ). We used three fossil calibrations from Schwarzhans et al () for the origins of Economidichthys (15.0 Mya), Pomatoschistus (excluding P. quagga , in accordance with the Bayesian results; 16.0 Mya), and Knipowitschia (13.0 Mya), applied as exponential priors, and a legacy calibration from the phylogeny of Thacker () for the origin of Gobionellidae at 48.7 Mya, assigned as a normal prior. We then trimmed the phylogeny to single exemplars of species for which we had shape data using Mesquite version 3.1.0 (Maddison & Maddison, ) for use in the comparative analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%