1968
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1968.00760060582005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ototoxicity of Topically Applied Chloramphenicol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

1976
1976
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(1967) reported that, when applied topically, chloramphenicol is toxic to the cochlea, and they advocated extra care in the topical use of chloramphenicol. Histopathologically also it has been confirmed that, when topically applied, chloramphenicol is harmful to the hair cells, supporting cells and stria vascularis of the basal turn of the cochlea (Proud et al 1968). There is a paucity of literature on the ototoxic effect of chloramphenicol when administered systemically, and to the best of our knowledge only two reports have appeared so far in the literature: Gargye and Dutta (1959) reported a case of nerve deafness following heavy doses of chloramphenicol in a child.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…(1967) reported that, when applied topically, chloramphenicol is toxic to the cochlea, and they advocated extra care in the topical use of chloramphenicol. Histopathologically also it has been confirmed that, when topically applied, chloramphenicol is harmful to the hair cells, supporting cells and stria vascularis of the basal turn of the cochlea (Proud et al 1968). There is a paucity of literature on the ototoxic effect of chloramphenicol when administered systemically, and to the best of our knowledge only two reports have appeared so far in the literature: Gargye and Dutta (1959) reported a case of nerve deafness following heavy doses of chloramphenicol in a child.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Animal experiments have shown that the round window membrane, despite being three-layered, behaves like a semipermeable membrane. Antibiotics (Bagger-Sjoback et al, 1992;Gullick and Patterson, 1963;Morizono and Johnstone, 1975a,b;Proud et al, 1968;Schuknecht, 1957;Smith and Myers, 1979;Webster et al, 1970;Wersall et al, 1971), antiseptics (Morizono et al, 1973;Morizono and Sikora, 1982), arachidonic acid metabolites (Jung et al, 1992), local anesthetics (Rahm et al, 1960;Hoft, 1969), toxins (Goycoolea et al, 1980c;Kawauchi et al, 1988;Lundman et al, 1992a,b;Lundman, 1993;Spandow et al, 1988Spandow et al, , 1989, and albumin (Goldberg et al, 1981;Goycoolea et al, 1980b;Hamaguchi et al, 1988;Juhn et al, 1988), placed in the round window niche, can either be recovered in perilymph or observed to cause inner ear changes, such as hair cell damage. Morphologic demonstration that passage of substances from the middle to the inner ear can occur through the membrane has been provided by reports of passage of cationic ferritin, horseradish-peroxidase, 1 µm latex spheres, and neomycin-gold spheres.…”
Section: Round Window Membrane Permeabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous ultrastructural studies of the RWM in several species [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] have shown that the RWM is composed of three layers: the epithelial layer lining the middle ear cavity, the mid dle layer containing fibroblasts and fiber components, and the inner layer facing the perilymph. It has been fully investigated by animal experiments that various sub stances such as horseradish peroxidase [8], radioactive isotopes [9,10], proteins [10], antibiotics [11][12][13][14], toxins [15] and ferritin [14] can pass into the scala tympani via the RWM. It is also well accepted that the RWM plays a role in releasing the perilymphatic pressure produced by the movement of the stapes and is an alternative route for sound energy to enter the cochlea.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%