This paper explores the depiction of public celebration in the late Hamidian period in Ottoman Jerusalem through the relationship between textual and photographic sources, and between state performers and the viewing public. The joy of public celebrations on the sultan's birthday and accession day conveyed in the Ottoman Turkish and Hebrew press was at odds with formal, flat photographs of the occasion, but in fact shared that aesthetic through its formulaic tropes and language.A key part of the narratives of these occasions in Jerusalem was the performance of music by the military band of the garrison. Through a close reading of these and other images, the uniform images and narratives of these public events of the state can be penetrated, and snapshots of discord, emotion, and reaction emerge that show performances to be perhaps cacophonous affairs, and the attending crowds a part of the scenery rather than active participants. As such, this paper will consider the role of these photographs in reconstructing both the experiential and political atmospheres of these formal state occasions. In particular, a stereographic image of a concert of the Jerusalem band in 1903 permits an alternative reading of these occasions. Using the chance details captured in the shot, the value of close readings of photographs as microhistories can be found in exposing narratives beyond those peddled by the state, and the flaws and tensions of the relationship between ruler and ruled thus becomes more readily apparent. * I am grateful to Lauren Banko, Zeinab Azarbadegan, Victoria Carolan, and Hifzah Tariq for their critical read-throughs of earlier drafts of this paper, and would like to thank the organizers of the 'Visual Sources for Ottoman History' workshop for their generous support and encouragement that enabled this research to go forward, and the participants at that workshop for providing such an exciting exchange of ideas. I would also like to express my gratitude to the anonymous reviewers for their extremely helpful comments, critiques, and recommendations. Finally, hat tip to Dikla Braier for spending so many hours sitting and staring at these photographs with me.Fünkchen Zufall]", something in the moment of the capture of the image that tells us something interesting, subversive, or profound. 2 Yet those insights within a photograph can be easily missed if the purpose of that image is merely illustrative, simple ornamentation to a more (supposedly) complex and analytical text. The photograph as a historical source is so much more than that. The Ottoman writer Ahmed Resim, who was a major contributor to the cultural and literary journal Servet-i Fünun (Treasure of Knowledge), wrote a reflection on photography in that journal in a piece called 'Fotoğrafım' (My Photograph), published in 1891. His reflection on the experience of being photographed is fascinating: "My physical being, in a split-second, left a thick shadow on the negative plate. Fifteen days later, there was a visible image of a complete likeness of my facial ...