2003
DOI: 10.1080/0739318032000067065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

"Our Bruised Arms Hung Up as Monuments": Nuclear Iconography in Post-Cold War Culture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scholars have developed a critical iconology of images to understand post-Cold War nuclear culture (Taylor, 2003) or U.S. presidential campaign ads depicting children (Sherr, 1999), and they employ theories of symbolic convergence to analyze political cartoons of the Clinton-Lewinsky-Starr investigation and impeachment case (Benoit et al, 2001). A recurring theme in rhetorical studies of cultural memory is the discourse surrounding new technologies (e.g., Stein, 2002).…”
Section: Periodical Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars have developed a critical iconology of images to understand post-Cold War nuclear culture (Taylor, 2003) or U.S. presidential campaign ads depicting children (Sherr, 1999), and they employ theories of symbolic convergence to analyze political cartoons of the Clinton-Lewinsky-Starr investigation and impeachment case (Benoit et al, 2001). A recurring theme in rhetorical studies of cultural memory is the discourse surrounding new technologies (e.g., Stein, 2002).…”
Section: Periodical Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are images with a piercing quality-what Barthes (1981) calls punctumthe resonances of which can reverberate across the planes of our existence (Bachelard, 1964). Many of these images form part of our collective memory, icons of a particular moment in time or of a shared experience (Hariman & Lucaites, 2003;Taylor, 2003). However, some images have a force that is solitary, private, and individual (Barthes, 1981;Brunius, 1970;Ingarden, 1985).…”
Section: The Sublime Amongst Usmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A related scholarly focus here involves the role of media systems in facilitating nuclear democracy. Elsewhere (Taylor 2003, 8), I have summarized the threats to this ideal posed by postwar media institutions and their programming, including: the historical complicity of media corporations economically linked with nuclear‐corporate contractors, censorship of images of victims of the Japanese atomic bombings, endorsement of anti‐Communist purification of domestic subversives, demonization of external enemies to justify a permanent war economy, depoliticizing nuclear test explosions as mythological wonders and victimless spectacles occurring in “uninhabited” areas, and depicting dubious antiballistic missile technologies as necessary and legitimate. To this summary may be added Rojecki's (1999) historical study of the challenges faced by anti‐nuclear social movements in securing favorable media coverage of their interests.…”
Section: Nuclear Weapons and Rhetorical Democracymentioning
confidence: 99%