1995
DOI: 10.3862/jcoloproctology.48.10_1113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Our Classic Treatment of Anal Fistula.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The recurrence rate of the sphincter-preserving procedure for ischiorectal anal fistula in Japan has been reported to be 1.5% to 9.2% [15,29,34]. Since the 1980s, the seton method was classified as radical treatment for deep anal fistula because of the poor results of this sphincter-preserving procedure [37,38]. According to Kurokawa et al (2002), the basic idea of the seton method is to not open the fistula tract all at once, but to take time to open it with a rubber band or with medical wire.…”
Section: )Seton Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recurrence rate of the sphincter-preserving procedure for ischiorectal anal fistula in Japan has been reported to be 1.5% to 9.2% [15,29,34]. Since the 1980s, the seton method was classified as radical treatment for deep anal fistula because of the poor results of this sphincter-preserving procedure [37,38]. According to Kurokawa et al (2002), the basic idea of the seton method is to not open the fistula tract all at once, but to take time to open it with a rubber band or with medical wire.…”
Section: )Seton Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%