“…Although their study included a control group, the small sample size, the shortterm follow-up (4 weeks), and the use of only subjective (MAS and ankle pRoM) or nonstandardized (baropodometry) measures of muscle stiffness represent important limitations compared to our research. In a 2014 study on a large group of 64 children with CP, Mirea et al (12) showed that ESWT (3 sessions, 500 SW per session, energy level 0.15 mJ/mm 2 , frequency 10 Hz) could decrease muscle spasticity at different anatomical sites. Although the sample size was large, the lack of a control group, the treatment of different muscles, the use of only subjective assessment tools (MAS, Gross Motor Function Classification System, Gross Motor Function Measure 66, and Questionnaire on Pain caused by spasticity), and the short-term follow-up are important weaknesses.…”