2005
DOI: 10.1080/14746700500317271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Our world is more than physics: a constructive – critical comment on the current science and theology debate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One can even speak of humans as ‘created co-creators’. This nominalization, however, appears too strong to me, because of biblical reservations to safeguard the word for ‘creation’ to God alone, and hence I want to translate the respective deliberations by Philipp Hefner (Hefner 1995) here in that way, that it is humankind's purpose to shape nature in creative and responsible participation in God's creation and with the means of culture towards increasing realization of freedom in relationship (Losch 2005: 285). We human images of God, however, do not only participate co-creatively in shaping our habitat, but we also destroy it 20 , which is illustrated theologically by the concept of sin – this is why Christian theology has contributed to the ideas of environmental protection and of sustainability (see, for instance, Moltmann, 1985; Barbour, 1994).…”
Section: What Is Going On? a Constructive-critical Realist Interpretamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can even speak of humans as ‘created co-creators’. This nominalization, however, appears too strong to me, because of biblical reservations to safeguard the word for ‘creation’ to God alone, and hence I want to translate the respective deliberations by Philipp Hefner (Hefner 1995) here in that way, that it is humankind's purpose to shape nature in creative and responsible participation in God's creation and with the means of culture towards increasing realization of freedom in relationship (Losch 2005: 285). We human images of God, however, do not only participate co-creatively in shaping our habitat, but we also destroy it 20 , which is illustrated theologically by the concept of sin – this is why Christian theology has contributed to the ideas of environmental protection and of sustainability (see, for instance, Moltmann, 1985; Barbour, 1994).…”
Section: What Is Going On? a Constructive-critical Realist Interpretamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Can theology build on modern physics? The development of the science–religion dialogue has been reviewed by Losch (), who points out that “our world is more than physics.” Christian hope for a new creation cannot be based on science (Benz , 162). The questions express doubts about a widespread philosophical attitude known as scientism or physicalism (Smedes ).…”
Section: Science and Religionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea was to call it "constructive-critical realism". I sketched out elsewhere in detail what is meant by this term (Losch 2005(Losch , 2010. Here, I want to elaborate on this idea in such a way as to reconcile these epistemologically rival positions within one term.…”
Section: Comparison With Barbour's Critical Realismmentioning
confidence: 99%