Out-in, in-out buyer quality innovation pathways for new product outcome: Empirical evidence from the Chinese consumer goods industry

Abstract

In today's dynamic environment, quality innovation and new product development (NPD) are the key factors in gaining competitive advantage. However, the quality innovation process is a complex procedure, because it may combine internal and external resource requirements to meet customer expectations. This paper reviews two quality innovation pathways and their respective NPD performances based on the joint supplier-buyer relationship within the fast consumer goods (FCGs) industry. Specifically, we study buyers' quality innovation potential using 'out-in,' which is the identification of quality innovative suppliers, and 'in-out,' which is buyers' quality knowledge transfer ability to suppliers. Our dyadic data from both buyers and suppliers reveal that the supplier's innovation ability and passion is the dominating factor, irrespective of quality innovation pathways, in the context of the Chinese consumer goods industry. However, cooperative attitude and the cost reduction ability of suppliers are the differentiating factors.

Inter-organizational collaboration and SMEs’ innovation: A systematic review and future research directions

“…Similarly, service innovation, referring to the development of service processes and capability development, is underresearched outcome (Santoro et al, 2018). This bias can be due to the studies' excessive focus on manufacturing industries that are production-oriented (Subramanian et al, 2019;Tranekjer & Søndergaard, 2013). Also, the concept of service innovation is loosely defined, and therefore, make it less distinguishable from related concepts (Witell et al, 2016).…”

The mediating role of environmental collaborations in the relationship manufacturing technologies and green innovation among firms in Thai sports industry

“…We have also measured the satisfaction level of lecturer's job. We have categorized the seven-point Likert scale into five as 1.00-2.20 as very low; 2.21-3.40 as low, 3.41-4.60 as moderate, whereas 4.61-5.80 as high and 5.81-7.00 as very high (Subramanian, Gunasekaran, & Abdulrahman, 2019). The hypotheses are aligned with the design of research questions and by using the smart PLS 3.1.2 which is also known as the second-generation multivariate data analysis, we have analysed the reliability and validity of the instrument by the assessment of structural and measurement model.…”

Brand co-creation through participation of organization, consumers, and suppliers: an empirical validation

“…A collaborative attitude provides a more significant opportunity for inter-firm relationships and renders better outcomes (Powell et al, 1996). Buyer-supplier collaboration quality results in better cocreation outcomes and reduces conflict (Subramanian et al, 2019). Flexibility and trust between a supplier and a buyer are vital, as a buyer's demands may fluctuate, and the supplier needs to be flexible to adjust to these changing demands.…”