2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioflm.2022.100081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Out of control: The need for standardised solvent approaches and data reporting in antibiofilm assays incorporating dimethyl-sulfoxide (DMSO)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These experiments revealed that the addition of 1% (v/v) DMSO and 0.1% (v/v) ethanol (equivalent to 17 mM) had a significant impact on AOM, resulting in >70% inhibition of AOM (Figure ). This was a surprising finding considering that DSMO is generally accepted as nontoxic below 10% (v/v) and biological effects of applied concentrations below 2% (v/v) are often unreported as assumed negligible . For comparison, a study on soil bacterial communities found only minor effects of DMSO in concentrations up to 5% (v/v) with a reduction in the growth rate of up to 20% .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These experiments revealed that the addition of 1% (v/v) DMSO and 0.1% (v/v) ethanol (equivalent to 17 mM) had a significant impact on AOM, resulting in >70% inhibition of AOM (Figure ). This was a surprising finding considering that DSMO is generally accepted as nontoxic below 10% (v/v) and biological effects of applied concentrations below 2% (v/v) are often unreported as assumed negligible . For comparison, a study on soil bacterial communities found only minor effects of DMSO in concentrations up to 5% (v/v) with a reduction in the growth rate of up to 20% .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This was a surprising finding considering that DSMO is generally accepted as nontoxic below 10% (v/v) and biological effects of applied concentrations below 2% (v/v) are often unreported as assumed negligible. 18 For comparison, a study on soil bacterial communities found only minor effects of DMSO in concentrations up to 5% (v/v) with a reduction in the growth rate of up to 20%. 19 Ethanol, even at low concentrations (0.63 mM), showed an almost complete inhibition of AOM (96 ± 1%) that did not recover within 96 h, which should be sufficient time for the ethanol to be consumed by the side community.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DMSO concentrations below 10 % (v/v) are generally considered non‐toxic [68] . A final concentration of 10 % DMSO was used as a negative (solvent) control in all simultaneous experiments [69] .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[67] DMSO concentrations below 10 % (v/v) are generally considered non-toxic. [68] A final concentration of 10 % DMSO was used as a negative (solvent) control in all simultaneous experiments. [69] However, 10 μg/plate sodium azide (TA97a), 40 μg/plate 9-AA (TA98), and 2.5 μg/plate NPDA (TA100) were used as positive controls.…”
Section: Mutagenicity and Antimutagenicity Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such minimum reporting information standards for experiments have included where sessile microbial communities exist on surfaces [ 16 ] and experiments that report spectrophotometric and fluorometric methods to assess biofilm formation [ 17 ]. In addition, recent papers have called for further work to standardise such methodology in biofilm research [ 18 , 19 ]. It is also widely acknowledged that vocabulary used to describe biofilms can be inconsistent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%