2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jue.2006.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Out of control: What can we learn from the end of Massachusetts rent control?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
98
2
9

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
7
98
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, some papers have studied more localized spillover effects of public housing and rent control on nearby uncontrolled units (see e.g. Sims, 2007, Baum-Snow and Marion, 2009, Autor et al, 2014and Diamond and McQuade, 2016. 7 Technically, the public housing buildings are also owned by limited liability companies, which are owned by the municipalities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, some papers have studied more localized spillover effects of public housing and rent control on nearby uncontrolled units (see e.g. Sims, 2007, Baum-Snow and Marion, 2009, Autor et al, 2014and Diamond and McQuade, 2016. 7 Technically, the public housing buildings are also owned by limited liability companies, which are owned by the municipalities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…may create lock-in effects in the housing market, with implications for residential and job mobility (Oswald, 1999;Van Ommeren and Van Leuvenstein, 2005). Stringent rental regulations may lower residential construction and reduce the mobility of incumbent tenants, thus lowering residential mobility (Sims, 2007;Lind, 2001). Housing market interventions which limit the supply of housing, such as restrictive land use regulations and building costs, can also constrain residential mobility (Caldera .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Justifications for the use of rent control include providing affordable housing services and supporting rent stabilization as well as balancing bargaining power inequality and addressing information asymmetries between landlords and tenants. Arguments against rent control emphasize that its implementation can contribute to rental housing underinvestment, insufficient spending on rental housing improvement and maintenance, inferior labor market outcomes, rental price distortion as well as inefficient resource allocation and distribution, i.e., consumers do not necessarily get the desired rental housing quality and size at the controlled price (e.g., Worldbank, 1993;Arnott, 1995;Sims, 2007;Andrews et al, 2011). Menard & Sellem (2010) indicate that subsidized tenants tend to accept lower-paid jobs and may be unemployed longer, as they are reluctant to give up relatively favorable tenancy conditions.…”
Section: Housing Tenure and Societal Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%