2017
DOI: 10.1080/07908318.2017.1378670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Out of many, one: challenges in teaching multilingual Kenyan primary students in English

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Use of the invariant tag in Kenyan EMC classrooms can also be seen as an example of "safe talk" strategies (Chick, 1996;Weber, 2008) that teachers develop in response to language restrictions and varying levels of proficiency in English (Hsieh, Ionescu, & Ho, 2018). Using isn't it helps the teacher to maintain classroom norms and to monitor student behavior and compliance with monolingual language policy, consistent with Bernstein's notion of regulative discourse.…”
Section: Isn't It As a Regulative Feature In Classroom Discoursementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Use of the invariant tag in Kenyan EMC classrooms can also be seen as an example of "safe talk" strategies (Chick, 1996;Weber, 2008) that teachers develop in response to language restrictions and varying levels of proficiency in English (Hsieh, Ionescu, & Ho, 2018). Using isn't it helps the teacher to maintain classroom norms and to monitor student behavior and compliance with monolingual language policy, consistent with Bernstein's notion of regulative discourse.…”
Section: Isn't It As a Regulative Feature In Classroom Discoursementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Two examples that report national assessment projects provide additional details into YLs’ development: one in a European (Csapó & Nikolov, 2009; Nikolov, 2009) and another one in an African context (Hsieh, Ionescu, & Ho, 2017). In Hungary, YLs’ proficiency was assessed on nationally representative samples of about ten thousand participants in years 6 and 8 in 2000 and in 2002 to measure their levels of FL proficiency, analyze how their language skills changed after two years, and what roles individual differences and variables of provision (number of weekly classes and years of FL learning) played.…”
Section: Assessment Of Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the potential instructional value of subscores, however, few previous investigations of subscores addressed language tests specifically designed for young learners. Research on assessments of young learners' language proficiency has become quite active in the recent years (Wolf & Butler, 2017), and as a standardized assessment of young EFL learners' English proficiency, the TOEFL Primary tests have been studied in terms of their theoretical and empirical properties (Cho et al, 2016;Hsieh et al, 2018;Lee & Winke, 2018;Zu, Moulder, & Morgan, 2017). In addition, the added-value of subscores from the TOEFL Primary Reading and Listening sections have been examined using Haberman's (2008) method (Papageorgiou & Choi, 2018), based on data collected from several operational administrations mostly in South American and Asian countries.…”
Section: Subscores In Language Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pilot data were originally collected in 2016 and used to evaluate the feasibility of using the TOEFL Primary test (Step 2) as a part of Kenya's national English education curriculum. The original purposes and background of the pilot administrations are detailed elsewhere (Hsieh et al, 2018).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%