2022
DOI: 10.3389/feart.2022.976962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Out of the blue: Volcanic SO2 emissions during the 2021–2022 eruptions of Hunga Tonga—Hunga Ha’apai (Tonga)

Abstract: Most volcanism on Earth is submarine, but volcanic gas emissions by submarine eruptions are rarely observed and hence largely unquantified. On 15 January 2022 a submarine eruption of Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha’apai (HTHH) volcano (Tonga) generated an explosion of historic magnitude, and was preceded by ∼1 month of Surtseyan eruptive activity and two precursory explosive eruptions. We present an analysis of ultraviolet (UV) satellite measurements of volcanic sulfur dioxide (SO2) between December 2021 and the climacti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
64
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
7
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The underwater HT eruption injected a huge amount of water vapour into the stratosphere, with an estimated amount exceeding 100 Tg 10,17 . These water vapour emissions are unprecedented in the satellite era; nevertheless, estimates with petrological methods indicate that large eruptions of the past, including the one of Pinatubo in 1991, may have produced even significantly larger water vapour emissions 11 . The large HT water vapour emissions are likely due to both volcanic caldera intrusion of seawater and mechanical interaction with seawater, over the underwater eruptive crater, during the eruption.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The underwater HT eruption injected a huge amount of water vapour into the stratosphere, with an estimated amount exceeding 100 Tg 10,17 . These water vapour emissions are unprecedented in the satellite era; nevertheless, estimates with petrological methods indicate that large eruptions of the past, including the one of Pinatubo in 1991, may have produced even significantly larger water vapour emissions 11 . The large HT water vapour emissions are likely due to both volcanic caldera intrusion of seawater and mechanical interaction with seawater, over the underwater eruptive crater, during the eruption.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Volcanic ash, gas and water vapour were injected well into the stratosphere, with a small part of the plume reaching the lower mesosphere 10 . Although the explosivity of the eruption was unprecedented, best estimates from different satellite instruments are consistent in measuring a total burden of the injected sulphur dioxide (SO 2 ) of about 0.4 Tg 11 . This is far less than the injected mass for the large magnitude Pinatubo eruption (Philippines, 1991), which emitted 14 to 23 Tg of SO 2 12 , or even the more recent moderate stratospheric Raikoke 2019 (1.5 ± 0.2 Tg 13 ) or Nabro 2011 eruptions (1.6 Tg 14 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of large amounts of water in the volcanic plume has probably led to very fast oxidation of volcanic sulfur dioxide emissions to sulfuric acid-the main component of stratospheric aerosol droplets 31,32 . Another potential factor of expedited SO 2 conversion to aerosols could be heterogeneous oxidation of SO 2 on the surface of ash 31,33 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extreme explosiveness of the Hunga eruption and the submarine location of the volcano add up to the unprecedented character, magnitude and the propagation timescale of the global stratospheric perturbation 20,22,24,31,32,34,50 . The eruption provided a unique natural testbed, lending itself to studies of climate sensitivity to strong change in both stratospheric gaseous and particulate composition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further remarkable fact is that the plume carried an unprecedented amount of water vapour into the stratosphere, increasing instantaneously its overall water vapour content by ∼ 10 % (Millán et al, 2022;Khaykin et al, 2022). Quite surprisingly, the satellite data gathered after the event reported a stratospheric SO 2 injection of only 0.5 Tg, on par with much smaller and less explosive eruptions (Millán et al, 2022;Carn et al, 2022). This led to an early estimate of negligible climatic impact (Witze, 2022;Zhang et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%