2021
DOI: 10.1177/08944865211050858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Out of the Comfort Zone! Family Leaders’ Subsidiary Ownership Choices and the Role of Vulnerabilities

Abstract: Based on the socioemotional wealth approach and a sample of 3,904 subsidiary ownership choices made by 586 family firms, this study shows that family-managed firms (i.e., those family firms with a family member in a leadership position) prefer wholly owned subsidies over joint ventures when entering foreign markets. Family-managed firms are also more likely to revise their subsidiary ownership choices and form joint ventures when in vulnerability conditions, that is, when they experience performance below aspi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, while these companies are under first generation management, the effects of SEW on financial debt become still more negative (Esparza-Aguilar et al, 2021). Pongelli et al (2021) apply an SEW approach to a sample of 586 family firms and report their preference for full ownership over subsidiaries rather than joint ventures in decisionmaking over entering international markets. However, in seeking non-economic advantages, family firms must also bear non-economic costs at different levels: individual, group, family and organisational, which may drive short-sighted behaviours, resulting in long-term, undesirable effects for the generations involved in subsequent business transfer processes (Ferrari, 2020).…”
Section: Thematic Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, while these companies are under first generation management, the effects of SEW on financial debt become still more negative (Esparza-Aguilar et al, 2021). Pongelli et al (2021) apply an SEW approach to a sample of 586 family firms and report their preference for full ownership over subsidiaries rather than joint ventures in decisionmaking over entering international markets. However, in seeking non-economic advantages, family firms must also bear non-economic costs at different levels: individual, group, family and organisational, which may drive short-sighted behaviours, resulting in long-term, undesirable effects for the generations involved in subsequent business transfer processes (Ferrari, 2020).…”
Section: Thematic Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pongelli et al . (2021) apply an SEW approach to a sample of 586 family firms and report their preference for full ownership over subsidiaries rather than joint ventures in decision-making over entering international markets.…”
Section: Thematic Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, compared with minority shareholdings, majority-owned FDIs entail greater resource commitments for the expanding organization, which enhances SEW losses at home in terms of noneconomic detriments to local stakeholders and financial strains over the parent organization. Furthermore, majority-owned FDIs also involve stronger psychological and cognitive commitments abroad by family members (Pongelli et al, 2021). Based on the assumption of humans' limited cognitive capacities, family members' inclination to exert personal control over subsidiaries overseas likely translates into decreased effort and attention to business dealings at home, further depressing the relationship with local stakeholders and external fund providers.…”
Section: The Moderating Effect Of Entry Mode: Majority-owned Fdismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As long as our personal development continues our lives gather more sense. Progressively, we define superior objectives, and we create a long-term-based personal view ( Pongelli et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%