2013
DOI: 10.1109/wcl.2013.012513.120834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outage Probability and SER of Amplify-and-Forward Cognitive Relay Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, different unlicensed users allocated with different maximum interference power levels is investigated and hence, more general than all previous works with the assumption of the same maximum interference power level for all unlicensed users such as [3,5,6,[8][9][10][11][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. As analysed thoroughly in [3,5,6,11,14,15,18,[24][25][26]29], I m stands implicitly for the interference limit from unlicensed users and excludes interference generated by licensed users. Equivalently, the licensed networks are implicitly assumed to operate reliably for interference levels caused by unlicensed users up to I m , regardless of the interference already existing in these networks.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, different unlicensed users allocated with different maximum interference power levels is investigated and hence, more general than all previous works with the assumption of the same maximum interference power level for all unlicensed users such as [3,5,6,[8][9][10][11][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. As analysed thoroughly in [3,5,6,11,14,15,18,[24][25][26]29], I m stands implicitly for the interference limit from unlicensed users and excludes interference generated by licensed users. Equivalently, the licensed networks are implicitly assumed to operate reliably for interference levels caused by unlicensed users up to I m , regardless of the interference already existing in these networks.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance of SU under AF relay selection scheme has been investigated in [15], [16] under the assumption of perfect CSI. In [17], the performance of SU in terms of outage and symbol error rate (SER) has been evaluated for a Rayleigh faded channel considering maximum transmit power constraint of the relay. In the above references, SU is assumed to perfectly know the CSI of link between SU transmitter (SU-Tx) and PU receiver (PU-Rx).The CSI is used in deriving the transmit power of SU.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [24], the capacity of SU is evaluated under both the average and peak interference constraints considering channel estimation error and feedback delay of the channel considering a Rayleigh faded channel. In [17], the performance of SU is evaluated under the maximum transmit power constraint of the relay with perfect CSI. In this paper we extend the analysis of [17] with imperfect CSI model of [24] in presence of multiple AF relays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, sometimes a relay station taking feedback/acknowledgement from the receiver to adjust the gain is called the variable gain AF relay. The concepts of an AF relay are summarized in [1][2][3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%