Outbound Foreign Direct Investment from China and India

Abstract

Chinese and Indian enterprises have been increasingly involved in international business thereby attracting global attention since the turn of the 21st century. This article examines outbound investment experiences of Chinese and Indian multinationals and compares and contrasts the investment development trajectory for both the countries. The comparisons and contrasts are made with respect to government policy, motivations for outbound investment, financing of investment, success rate in overseas acquisition, sectoral composition, characteristics of multinational enterprises (MNEs), and the challenges and impact of such investments in the light of differences in economic and institutional parameters between the two countries. It can be observed that there are more differences than similarities in the trajectory of outbound investments by Chinese and Indian enterprises. These differences arise due to the economic and institutional structure and the development path chosen by the two countries. Due to the differences between Chinese and Indian economic development trajectories, which are unique in many ways, it is not meaningful to make a straightforward comparison of outbound foreign direct investment (FDI) experience of the two countries. Nevertheless, the main differences with regard to outward investment by Indian and Chinese enterprises can be observed in areas such as the degree of involvement of the public sector enterprises, financing of overseas investments, success rate of proposed mergers and acquisitions (M&A), sectoral composition of such investments, investment motives, and so on. Various challenges facing outward FDI from China and India are highlighted, some of which could be addressed by specific economic and institutional reforms. The tale of the two countries examined in this article taken together contains important insights for emerging country enterprises and governments on the challenges and opportunities of global business.

Financial crisis of 2008 and outward foreign investments from China and India

“…The availability of credit finance depends upon the presence of lenders and borrowers but the ability to spread risks depends on how deep the financial market is (thickness of buyers and sellers) and systems of monitoring that can evaluate and price risk. Das & Banik (2015) show that although firms in both India and China face imperfect financial markets there are important differences between the two countries.…”

Economic Interdependence Since COVID-19: China and South Asia

“…The USA has blacklisted several Chinese companies in its own turf. It may be noted that Chinese investment has faced completion challenges even before the BRI phase due to state ownership of businesses (Das and Banik 2015). Major Chinese investments in South Asia (with the exception of venture capital investment in India) are still led by State Owned Enterprises in sectors such as energy, telecom and transportation.…”

Outward investment from emerging markets: time for a paradigm shift?

“…Studies on Brazil suggest the government retains a dominant control over the banking system (Ness, 2000). Financial markets in India are better developed but here too public sector lending is large and financial lending is also sensitive to the riskiness of investments, which in turn is reflected a higher cost of capital for investments perceived to be risky (Das and Banik, 2015). This means credit is not available to a whole class of borrowers perceived as risky (small firms, young firms) and also to projects perceived as risky (technological investments and foreign investments).…”