Outbreak of COVID-19 and SARS in mainland China: a comparative study based on national surveillance data

Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare the epidemiological characteristics and transmission dynamics in relation to interventions against the COVID-19 and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak in mainland China.DesignComparative study based on a unique data set of COVID-19 and SARS.SettingOutbreak in mainland China.ParticipantsThe final database included 82 858 confirmed cases of COVID-19 and 5327 cases of SARS.MethodsWe brought together all existing data sources and integrated them into a comprehensive data set. Individual information on age, sex, occupation, residence location, date of illness onset, date of diagnosis and clinical outcome was extracted. Control measures deployed in mainland China were collected. We compared the epidemiological and spatial characteristics of COVID-19 and SARS. We estimated the effective reproduction number to explore differences in transmission dynamics and intervention effects.ResultsCompared with SARS, COVID-19 affected more extensive areas (1668 vs 230 counties) within a shorter time (101 vs 193 days) and had higher attack rate (61.8 vs 4.0 per million persons). The COVID-19 outbreak had only one epidemic peak and one epicentre (Hubei Province), while the SARS outbreak resulted in two peaks and two epicentres (Guangdong Province and Beijing). SARS-CoV-2 was more likely to infect older people (median age of 52 years), while SARS-CoV tended to infect young adults (median age of 34 years). The case fatality rate (CFR) of either disease increased with age, but the CFR of COVID-19 was significantly lower than that of SARS (5.6% vs 6.4%). The trajectory of effective reproduction number dynamically changed in relation to interventions, which fell below 1 within 2 months for COVID-19 and within 5.5 months for SARS.ConclusionsChina has taken more prompt and effective responses to combat COVID-19 by learning lessons from SARS, providing us with some epidemiological clues to control the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic worldwide.

Early Psychiatric Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the General Population and Healthcare Workers in Italy: A Preliminary Study

“…With 74,348 total cases and 13,575 deaths, Lombardy is arguably the most severely stricken Italian region. The rate of transmissibility suggested by the COVID-19 reproductive number has been estimated at around 4 ( 1 ), indicating that every infected person might transmit the infection up to 4 people. In order to limit the outbreak, Italian authorities ordered a strict quarantine at the beginning of March, along with a complete lockdown of the country.…”

Psychological Effects of Social Isolation Due to Quarantine in Chile: An Exploratory Study

“…In the history of pandemics, one of the viruses with a worldwide impact was H1N1, which had an infection rate of ~1.6 infected by one subject with the virus, and its symptomatology was quickly evident ( 4 , 5 ). COVID-19 has a higher level of contagion, estimated at 4.08 ( 5 ), and it also presents characteristics that are mutating, such as the symptoms and presence of the virus, even in asymptomatic conditions ( 4 – 6 ). These cause high levels of anxiety and fear about the future ( 7 , 8 ).…”

Evaluating the effectiveness of control measures in multiple regions during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020

“…The SARS-CoV-2 virus was closely related to SARS-like coronaviruses [146] . SARS-CoV-2 affects more regions within a shorter time than SARS-CoV, infecting older people with a higher probability [149] . However, the pathway of transmission from zoonotic reservoirs to humans is still unknown.…”