2021
DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/abe406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outbursting Young Stellar Object PGIR 20dci in the Perseus Arm

Abstract: We report the discovery of a likely outbursting Class I young stellar object, associated with the star-forming region NGC 281-W (distance ∼2.8 kpc). The source is currently seen only at infrared wavelengths, appearing in both the Palomar Gattini InfraRed (1.2 μm) and the Near-Earth Object Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (3.4 and 4.6 μm) photometric time-domain surveys. Recent near-infrared imaging reveals a new, extended scattered light nebula. Recent near-infrared spectroscopy confirms the similarity of P… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 44 large amplitude transients passed our selection criteria and human vetting. Eleven sources were determined to be active galactic nuclei known from prior surveys, three were classified as bright extragalactic supernovae (e.g., De et al 2020c; to be presented in G. Srinivasaragavan et al 2021, in preparation), seven sources were determined to be outbursts of young stellar objects (e.g., Hankins et al 2020, presented in Hillenbrand et al 2021and M. Hankins et al 2021 and one source was a previously known low mass X-ray binary in outburst (Hankins et al 2019). We identified two microlensing events using their characteristic photometric evolution (e.g., De et al 2019b;to be presented in P. Mroz et al 2021, in preparation) In particular, dwarf novae (Warner 1995) from cataclysmic variables bear striking photometric similarities to nova outbursts and represent a contaminant in this search.…”
Section: Confirmation and Follow-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 44 large amplitude transients passed our selection criteria and human vetting. Eleven sources were determined to be active galactic nuclei known from prior surveys, three were classified as bright extragalactic supernovae (e.g., De et al 2020c; to be presented in G. Srinivasaragavan et al 2021, in preparation), seven sources were determined to be outbursts of young stellar objects (e.g., Hankins et al 2020, presented in Hillenbrand et al 2021and M. Hankins et al 2021 and one source was a previously known low mass X-ray binary in outburst (Hankins et al 2019). We identified two microlensing events using their characteristic photometric evolution (e.g., De et al 2019b;to be presented in P. Mroz et al 2021, in preparation) In particular, dwarf novae (Warner 1995) from cataclysmic variables bear striking photometric similarities to nova outbursts and represent a contaminant in this search.…”
Section: Confirmation and Follow-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have extracted aperture photometry from K-band images of PGIR20dci in our data archive, using the same 2. ′′ 25 aperture radius as was used by Hillenbrand et al (2021) for their K s data point. The first image was obtained in 1990 as part of the K ′ filter imaging survey of star-forming regions by Hodapp (1994).…”
Section: Observations and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The photometric calibration is based on a set of 25 2MASS (Skrutskie et al 2006) stars with perfect 2MASS photometry flags common to all the K-band images used here. Based on the color information near maximum by Hillenbrand et al (2021) and interpolation of the color corrections given by (Wainscoat & Cowie 1992) we correct the early K ′ photometry towards brighter values by subtracting 0.08 mag, and we correct the WFCAM photometry by adding 0.12 mag, so that the data shown in Fig. 1 and listed in Table 1 are effectively in the K s system.…”
Section: Observations and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations