2022
DOI: 10.1017/ajil.2022.60
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcasting the Aggressor: The Deployment of the Sanction of “Non-participation”

Abstract: This Essay explores the sanction of “non-participation,” which has been used against Russia following the start of the war in Ukraine. After mapping out the multifaceted instances of Russia's exclusion from international organizations, the analysis considers the legality of measures adopted that do not have an explicit basis in institutional rules. The Essay concludes with broad reflections on the use of international organizations as platforms to stigmatize and isolate the violator and outlines some consequen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If particular cooperative activities relevant to the Arctic are undertaken under a treaty framework, the advice would be that Russia may not be suspended or excluded from such cooperative activities without the other treaty parties demonstrating that Russia has materially breached the same treaty and that the unanimous agreement of the parties other than Russia had been obtained. In the case of ICES, the decision to temporarily suspend Russian participation in all its activities was taken by a majority decision of 18 in favour, one against and one abstention (Buscemi, 2022), which is possible under the Rules of Procedure of ICES. If this case were to be legally justified as a suspension of Russian right under the treaty, such measure must have satisfied the high threshold provided in the VCLT, as described above.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If particular cooperative activities relevant to the Arctic are undertaken under a treaty framework, the advice would be that Russia may not be suspended or excluded from such cooperative activities without the other treaty parties demonstrating that Russia has materially breached the same treaty and that the unanimous agreement of the parties other than Russia had been obtained. In the case of ICES, the decision to temporarily suspend Russian participation in all its activities was taken by a majority decision of 18 in favour, one against and one abstention (Buscemi, 2022), which is possible under the Rules of Procedure of ICES. If this case were to be legally justified as a suspension of Russian right under the treaty, such measure must have satisfied the high threshold provided in the VCLT, as described above.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the 30 March ICES decision, albeit "temporary," would legally be characterised as a suspension of participatory rights of Russia under the treaty (Shibata, 2022). At the same time, as will be discussed below, since the majority decision-making is allowed under ICES Rules of Procedure, such an institutional decision to temporarily suspend the participation of a member was actually taken according to such procedural rules (Buscemi, 2022). The authors of this article have not been able to obtain ICES's official legal opinion on this point.…”
Section: The International Council For the Exploration Of The Seamentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Martina Buscemi argues that a range of global international organizations have suspended Russia or otherwise limited its participation in meetings or decision making, even when the legal basis for doing so is unclear. 56 In her view, the "paralysis" of the UN Security Council during the war has helped to produce more powerful international organizations. 57 Buscemi's assessment is consistent with what Elena Chacko and Katarina Linos find with respect to the EU, which has centralized its authority over foreign policy, energy, and migration during this war.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expulsion, on the other hand, could serve not only to allow the Security Council to act but also as an important "non-participation" sanction by which the lawbreaker is denied the benefits of international cooperation. This tactic is a well-known means of intimidation that might pressure the "pariah state" into giving up its abominable ways (Buscemi 2022). Furthermore, both reactivating the Security Council and marginalizing those who disrespect the most basic principles of peaceful relations can, in turn, help to revive the credibility and relevance of the United Nations.…”
Section: Expelling a Permanent Member Or Similar Alternativesmentioning
confidence: 99%