1999
DOI: 10.1136/emj.16.3.182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcome after severe head injury treated by an integrated trauma system.

Abstract: Emerg Med 1999;16:182-185)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These patients should be anaesthetised, intubated, and ventilated if transported by helicopter. 14 The risk of vomiting is increased in the presence of a skull fracture, direct brain stem injury associated with raised intracranial pressure, and intracranial haematoma. Comatose head injured patients (AVPU score P or U, GCS ,9) may also be unable to maintain and protect their airways and this is itself an indication for RSI and tracheal intubation.…”
Section: Adverse Clinical Signsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These patients should be anaesthetised, intubated, and ventilated if transported by helicopter. 14 The risk of vomiting is increased in the presence of a skull fracture, direct brain stem injury associated with raised intracranial pressure, and intracranial haematoma. Comatose head injured patients (AVPU score P or U, GCS ,9) may also be unable to maintain and protect their airways and this is itself an indication for RSI and tracheal intubation.…”
Section: Adverse Clinical Signsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flight crew configurations and the range of prehospital critical care skills available vary in different prehospital care systems. There is conflicting evidence in the literature as to which incident type and what flight crew combination (for example, paramedic 51 or nurse 52 alone, paramedic-paramedic, 53 paramedic-doctor, 14 54-66 paramedic-nurse, 34 58 67 68 70 71 nurse-doctor, 52 58 69 72 and nursenurse 67 68 ) are best suited to deliver this level of care in the field. A number of different outcomes (for example, patient mortality, critical care procedures undertaken, duration of stay in hospital/ITU) have been used in an attempt to assess this important issue, and all available studies have important limitations.…”
Section: Prehospital Critical Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although TBI has been termed an “untreatable” predictor of mortality [1] , advances in trauma care systems, pre-hospital care, and critical care have led to improvements in patient survival following TBI. There is evidence to suggest that integration of trauma services [2] , [3] , [4] , direct transport of patients from the scene to hospital [5] , and the level of pre-hospital care can impact on TBI patient survival [6] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of a system is improved by continuous feedback of useful outcome measures 18. The evolution of intensive care and trauma systems has been assisted by the existence of an accurate feedback loop 28. Neither Australia nor the UK has a structure for sharing a comparative dataset, although there are plans to remedy this in both regions with the establishment of UKHEMS and ‘National Retrieval Directors’ in Australia 29.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%