1990
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1990.tb03528.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcome and efficacy expectancy in the prediction of post‐treatment drinking behaviour

Abstract: A recent controversy in research on self-efficacy theory has been directed at the role of outcome and efficacy expectancies in the prediction of behaviour. While Bandura maintains that outcome expectancies add little information to prediction beyond that explained by efficacy expectations, others disagree. The present study explored the efficacy-outcome expectancy relationship in a population of alcoholic clients as they moved through a traditional treatment program and were contacted following a three-month a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
70
2
10

Year Published

1992
1992
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
8
70
2
10
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, more than 30 baseline variables have been identified and clustered into sociodemographic, alcohol-related and clinical domains [19,20]. Some studies have reported that certain variables that are commonly used as primary outcomes may have predictive value, including baseline alcohol consumption [21][22][23][24], dependence severity [24][25][26][27] and history of previous treatment or intervention [23,[28][29][30]. Only one such study has investigated whether relapse can be predicted by measuring baseline QOL, using the Life Situation Survey (LSS) in a small sample of alcohol-dependent patients, but this approach failed to identify any significant predictors [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, more than 30 baseline variables have been identified and clustered into sociodemographic, alcohol-related and clinical domains [19,20]. Some studies have reported that certain variables that are commonly used as primary outcomes may have predictive value, including baseline alcohol consumption [21][22][23][24], dependence severity [24][25][26][27] and history of previous treatment or intervention [23,[28][29][30]. Only one such study has investigated whether relapse can be predicted by measuring baseline QOL, using the Life Situation Survey (LSS) in a small sample of alcohol-dependent patients, but this approach failed to identify any significant predictors [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, few studies in any area of child psychotherapy or pain management research have assessed or controlled for the comparability of expectancies for improvement invoked by different randomized conditions before receiving treatment (Bandura, 1986;McGlynn & McDonnell, 1974;Solomon & Annis, 1990). This is a particular problem when one condition is perceived to be innovative and hence potentially more advantageous to be randomized into.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in a study examining control self-efficacy with inpatient subjects, Solomon and Annis (1990) found that a patient's confidence in his or her ability to abstain from drinking was heightened during treatment. In addition, the researchers found that the level of self-efficacy upon a patient's admission to a treatment program was strongly linked to the individual's daily alcohol intake three months following the treatment.…”
Section: The Assessment Of Self-efficacy In Smoking Cessation Programmentioning
confidence: 99%