Outcome evaluation of Active Herts: A community-based physical activity programme for inactive adults at risk of cardiovascular disease and/or low mental wellbeing

Abstract

BackgroundA high proportion of UK adults are inactive, which can lead to a range of physical and mental health concerns. Active Herts is a community-based physical activity programme for inactive adults at risk of cardiovascular disease and/or low mental wellbeing. This paper provides a pragmatic evaluation of this programme.MethodThis longitudinal study observed 717 adults (68% female, mean age = 56.9 years) from the “Active Herts” programme. Programme users were provided with a 45-min consultation with a “Get Active Specialist,” who talked them through an Active Herts self-help booklet and then signposted them to free or subsidized local exercise sessions. Programme users were followed up with a booster call 2 weeks later. The Get Active Specialist was a registered exercise professional (REPS Level 3), with additional training from the study team in motivational interviewing, health coaching, COM-B behavioral diagnosis and delivery of behavior change techniques (BCTs) in practice. The Active Herts booklet contained theoretically-driven and evidence-based BCTs to translate behavioral science into public health practice. Physical activity (Metabolic Equivalent Time [METs], measured using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), perceived health (EQ-5D-5L) and mental wellbeing (Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale: WEMWBS) were measured at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months.ResultsAt the end of the 12-month programme, users showed sustained improvements in physical activity (by +1331 METS), exceeding weekly recommendations. Sitting (reducing by over an hour per day), sporting participation, and perceptions of health were also improved, with improvements in mental wellbeing in the first 3 months.ConclusionDesigning and delivering a community-based physical activity programme that is theoretically-driven and evidence-based with frequent behavior change training and supervision can yield a significant increase in self-reported physical activity, reduction in sitting behavior and improvements to perceived health and mental wellbeing. Future research should extend this approach, utilizing a real-world, pragmatic evaluation.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, identifier (NCT number): NCT03153098.

The Regulate your Sitting Time (RESIT) intervention for reducing sitting time in individuals with type 2 diabetes: findings from a randomised-controlled feasibility trial

“…These coaching sessions harnessed the G.R.O.W. (Goal, Reality, Options, Will) model [ 32 ] to address each participant’s capability, opportunity, and motivation to change sitting behaviour, utilising the COM-B model [ 33 ]; an approach used to explain sitting behaviour and used in previous physical activity intervention research [ 34 ]. Coaching sessions typically lasted between 15 and 30 min.…”

Investigating anti-doping roles of athlete support personnel working with international disabled athletes in six European nations using the COM-B Model and Theoretical Domains Framework

“…It offers a systematic method to inform comprehensive interventions that are directed towards specific behaviors and influencing factors, increasing the chance of the intervention meeting its objectives [16]. The model has been widely used in several fields, including physical activity promotion (e.g., Active Herts, [18,19]). In the anti-doping field, the COM-B model has so far been used to guide a global audit of coach anti-doping education [20] and, in combination with TDF, has underpinned a meta-synthesis of barriers and enablers to clean sport behaviors [1].…”