2001
DOI: 10.1054/jocn.2000.0764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcome following anterior cervical discectomyin compensation patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The main disadvantages with these approaches include the inherent bias and individual variation in assessment with self-evaluation as well as a lack of standardization of outcomes across different surgical procedures [ 7 8 ]. Mental state, depression, psychological factors and the role of compensation and litigious action, well outside the scope of a surgical intervention, can result in significant variances of these Quality of Life outcome scores [ 9 ]. Advances in wireless technology coupled to accelerometers and global positioning systems have led to the advent of real-time recording and monitoring with the potential of providing objective quantification of activity and function during the postoperative recovery period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main disadvantages with these approaches include the inherent bias and individual variation in assessment with self-evaluation as well as a lack of standardization of outcomes across different surgical procedures [ 7 8 ]. Mental state, depression, psychological factors and the role of compensation and litigious action, well outside the scope of a surgical intervention, can result in significant variances of these Quality of Life outcome scores [ 9 ]. Advances in wireless technology coupled to accelerometers and global positioning systems have led to the advent of real-time recording and monitoring with the potential of providing objective quantification of activity and function during the postoperative recovery period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies that assessed patient outcome and fusion status following anterior cervical decompression fusion for radiculopathy note similar rates of fusion between compensable and noncompensable patients, but with a higher rate of poorer outcome based on subjective scoring analysis in the compensable group. 5 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these factors have been shown in multiple studies to be associated with a lower success rate among lumbar fusion patients. [16][17][18][19][20][21] It is therefore concerning to note that among the patients in this study who were TDR candidates, 44% had WCI, and 22% were on permanent disability, with Medicare as their primary health insurance, as a result of a work-related injury. Thus, fully 66% of patients who were TDR candidates were at risk to have their clinical outcomes compromised by possible secondary-gain issues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%