Abstract:A preliminary study was carried out on a population of twenty-five consecutive and unselected patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. A matched control group of subjects suffering from same pathology, but unoperated, was compared to experimental sample. A battery of neuropsychological tests, the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale and the Jachuck's Quality of Life Impairment Scale were administered one week before surgery, two weeks after (surgical sample only) and then eight months later. The research shows… Show more
“…Seven studies [4, 17, 18, 20, 23, 26, 29]performed two post-operative assessments and one performed three [19]. The mean follow-up time of all 26 studies to the last assessment was 22 weeks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many of the endarterectomy studies failed to measure mood state, those which did measure patient mood consistently reported an improvement postoperatively, both in anxiety [6, 16, 26]and depression [4, 16]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An improvement in cognitive functioning may be expected from both reduced embolism and improved capacity to cope haemodynamically with hypotension or cardiac arrhythmia [4]. Alternatively, a deterioration in cognition may result from perioperative impairment in perfusion pressure or surgically triggered showers of emboli released into the brain [5].…”
Background and Purpose: The extent to which carotid endarterectomy (CEA) influences cognitive functioning has been the subject of a number of studies often with conflicting conclusions. This paper systematically reviews the literature in an attempt to clarify this issue. Results: Although the majority of studies (16/28) reported an improvement in cognition after surgery, a substantial minority (12/28) found no change. Studies before 1984 tended to report an improvement, while later studies tended to report no change in cognition. Cognitive improvement was also more likely the longer the time interval between CEA and assessment. The studies were found to differ on many methodological factors, e.g. sample size, type of patient and control group, severity and side of carotid stenosis, the range of cognitive tests and timing of postoperative assessment. Conclusion: Given the conflicting findings, and the methodological issues, it is not possible to draw a clear conclusion regarding the impact of carotid endarterectomy upon cognition. Future research which pays attention to these methodological factors is needed in order to adequately resolve the current debate.
“…Seven studies [4, 17, 18, 20, 23, 26, 29]performed two post-operative assessments and one performed three [19]. The mean follow-up time of all 26 studies to the last assessment was 22 weeks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many of the endarterectomy studies failed to measure mood state, those which did measure patient mood consistently reported an improvement postoperatively, both in anxiety [6, 16, 26]and depression [4, 16]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An improvement in cognitive functioning may be expected from both reduced embolism and improved capacity to cope haemodynamically with hypotension or cardiac arrhythmia [4]. Alternatively, a deterioration in cognition may result from perioperative impairment in perfusion pressure or surgically triggered showers of emboli released into the brain [5].…”
Background and Purpose: The extent to which carotid endarterectomy (CEA) influences cognitive functioning has been the subject of a number of studies often with conflicting conclusions. This paper systematically reviews the literature in an attempt to clarify this issue. Results: Although the majority of studies (16/28) reported an improvement in cognition after surgery, a substantial minority (12/28) found no change. Studies before 1984 tended to report an improvement, while later studies tended to report no change in cognition. Cognitive improvement was also more likely the longer the time interval between CEA and assessment. The studies were found to differ on many methodological factors, e.g. sample size, type of patient and control group, severity and side of carotid stenosis, the range of cognitive tests and timing of postoperative assessment. Conclusion: Given the conflicting findings, and the methodological issues, it is not possible to draw a clear conclusion regarding the impact of carotid endarterectomy upon cognition. Future research which pays attention to these methodological factors is needed in order to adequately resolve the current debate.
“…However, Bornstein et al [26], De Leo et al [27], and Greiffenstein et al [28] reported that verbal tasks improved in patients who underwent CEA on the right side, while no significant change was noted in patients who had CEA on the left side. Thus, a definite conclusion regarding the effect of CEA on cognitive function based on the operation side of CEA cannot be made based on these studies.…”
We investigated changes in neuropsychological function in patients with carotid stenosis following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in relation to cerebral hemodynamics. The subjects were 24 patients who underwent CEA and 17 healthy controls matched by age, educational level, gender and handedness. Cerebral angiography, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and neuropsychological tests were performed approximately 1 week before and 3 weeks after CEA in all patients. In the patient group, the categories achieved in the new modified Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) improved significantly after CEA (4.0 ± 2.0; before CEA: 2.3 ± 2.1, p < 0.01). The perseverative errors of Nelson in the WCST improved significantly (before CEA: 9.1 ± 6.9, after CEA: 3.3 ± 3.4, p < 0.01). The difficulty maintaining set in the WCST improved significantly (before CEA: 2.3 ± 1.9, after CEA: 1.3 ± 1.7, p < 0.05). In the control group, none of the test scores showed significant improvement between the first and second tests. Moreover, frontal lobe function improved significantly in those patients with baseline carotid artery diameter of more than 70% of normal, or whose preoperative cerebral perfusion reserve was reduced by less than 15% of a response to acetazolamide. Our results suggest that CEA improves frontal lobe function in patients with severe carotid stenosis or reduced cerebral perfusion reserve.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.