2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-020-05537-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcome Measurement at a Ugandan Referral Hospital: Validation of the Mbarara Surgical Services Quality Assurance Database

Abstract: Background Five billion people lack access to surgery. Accurate and complete data have been identified as essential to the global scale-up of perioperative care. This study retrospectively validates the Mbarara Surgical Services Quality Assurance Database (SQUAD), an electronic outcomes database at a Ugandan secondary referral hospital. Methods SQUAD data were compared to paper records from August 2013 to January 2017. To assess data entry accuracy, two researchers independently extracted 24 patient variables … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An evaluation of this analog logbook system performed in 2016 by Svendsen and Helgerud et al [ 14 ] identified inaccuracies and labor-intensive follow-up and recommended the development of a fully digital e-logbook. This recommendation was supported by a study in Uganda that reported that an electronic database captured 97.5% of the operation logbook entries [ 15 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…An evaluation of this analog logbook system performed in 2016 by Svendsen and Helgerud et al [ 14 ] identified inaccuracies and labor-intensive follow-up and recommended the development of a fully digital e-logbook. This recommendation was supported by a study in Uganda that reported that an electronic database captured 97.5% of the operation logbook entries [ 15 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The completeness of population capture, the accuracy and completeness of data extraction, and the reliability of procedure coding were externally validated. [13][14][15] The database is housed on a server in the hospital. Staffing included 5 data clerks/coders, an operations manager, and an information technology expert/statistician.…”
Section: Database Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The completeness of population capture, the accuracy and completeness of data extraction, and the reliability of procedure coding were externally validated. 13–15…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%