Outcome of a controlled trial of the effectiveness of intensive case management for chronic public inebriates.

Cox, Gary B.; Walker, Robert; Freng, Scott; Short, B; Meijer, Laurent; Gilchrist, Lewayne D.

doi:10.15288/jsa.1998.59.523

Cited by 57 publications

(103 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In another study, 24 only 20% of people with case-managed alcoholism were able to maintain housing. Although housing is immensely beneficial for health, it is difficult to maintain without appropriate skills.…”

Section: Prementioning

confidence: 93%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Shelter-based managed alcohol administration to chronicallyhomeless people addicted to alcohol

Podymow

Turnbull²,

Coyle³

et al. 2006

Canadian Medical Association Journal

106

133

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Prementioning

confidence: 93%

“…6,[21][22][23][24][25] Obstacles to sobriety include psychiatric illness, poor social support, lack of stable housing, duration of addiction and refusal of treatment.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Shelter-based managed alcohol administration to chronicallyhomeless people addicted to alcohol

Podymow

Turnbull²,

Coyle³

et al. 2006

Canadian Medical Association Journal

106

133

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Persons with substance abuse problems who were assessed but had not yet attended their first clinical appointment have received services from case managers in centralized intake units (Carr et al, 2008;Scott et al, 2002). In-treatment case management has stressed retention in treatment as well as improvement in substance use, criminal justice involvement, and a variety of other outcomes (Conrad et al, 1998;Cox et al, 1998;Saleh et al, 2003). In order to maintain gains made while in treatment, case management has also received attention as an important part of the aftercare period (Siegal, Li, & Rapp, 2002).…”

Section: Role In the Continuum Of Carementioning

confidence: 99%

The efficacy of case management with persons who have substance abuse problems: A three-level meta-analysis of outcomes.

Rapp

Noortgate

Broekaert

et al. 2014

Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Case management has been widely used as an intervention in the treatment of substance abuse problems. Its effectiveness has been associated with over 450 outcomes, some consistent with case management's traditional functions of linking (treatment tasks) and others typical of treatment outcomes such as substance use (personal functioning). Method: Meta-analyses were conducted on 21 randomized clinical trials in which we compared the efficacy of case management with standard-of-care conditions and active interventions. Characteristics of case managementincluding targeted outcomes, case management model, location on the treatment continuum, and intervention quality-were treated as moderators, as were 2 study features, length of follow-up, and methodological quality. Results: Results showed that case management was efficacious across all targeted outcomes when compared with standard of care (␦ ϭ 0.15, SE ϭ 0.037), although the overall effect was weak. There was a significant difference, F(1, 429) ϭ 25.26, p Ͻ .0001, between case management's effect on treatment task outcomes such as linking with and staying in treatment (␦ 2 ϭ .29, p ϭ .001) and improving individuals' functioning of persons with substance abuse problems in areas such as substance use and HIV risk behaviors (␦ 1 ϭ 0.06, p ϭ .05). Moderator analyses demonstrated that (a) 4 case management models were more effective than standard of care in improving treatment task outcomes and (b) case management was effective either in or out of treatment. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that case management is effective across a wide range of treatment task outcomes, but more limited in its effectiveness with personal functioning outcomes.

show abstract

“…Attrition is defi ned as loss of participants (and their subsequent data) during follow-up (Bailey et al, 1992;Cox et al, 1998;Grekin et al, 2007;Jessor and Jessor, 1975;Locke and Newcomb, 2003;Paschall and Freisthlet, 2003;Prescott and Kendler, 2001). Defi nitions of attrition bias have differed slightly in previous literature: Miller and Wright (1995) state that "attrition results in a potential threat of bias if those who drop out have unique characteristics such that remaining sample ceases to be representative of the original sample" (p. 921).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Attrition Bias in a U.S. Internet Survey of Alcohol Use Among College Freshmen

McCoy

Ip²,

Blocker³

et al. 2009

J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT. Objective: Attrition bias is an important issue in survey research on alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use. The issue is even more salient for Internet studies, because these studies often have higher rates of attrition than face-to-face or telephone surveys, and there is limited research examining the issue in the fi eld of drug usage, specifi cally for college underclassmen. This study assessed whether measures of highrisk drinking and alcohol-related consequences were related to attrition groups ("stayers" or "leavers") in a cohort of college freshmen. Method: Data were collected in 2003 and 2004 from 2,144 fi rst-year college students at 10 universities in the southeastern United States. Demographics, indicators of high-risk drinking, and alcohol-related consequences were compared between cohort stayers and leavers in statistical analyses using two methods. Results: Analyses indicated that cohort leavers reported signifi cantly higher levels of high-risk drinking (past-30-day heavy episodic drinking, weekly drunkenness) and past-30-day smoking but not signifi cantly increased alcohol-related consequences. The directionality of bias was modestly consistent across outcomes and comparison methods. Conclusions: The current study's fi ndings suggest that intervention efforts to reduce smoking or high-risk drinking need to consider attrition bias during study follow-up or account for it in analyses. (J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs 70: [606][607][608][609][610][611][612][613][614] 2009)

show abstract

Outcome of a controlled trial of the effectiveness of intensive case management for chronic public inebriates.

Cited by 57 publications

References 26 publications

Shelter-based managed alcohol administration to chronicallyhomeless people addicted to alcohol

Shelter-based managed alcohol administration to chronicallyhomeless people addicted to alcohol

The efficacy of case management with persons who have substance abuse problems: A three-level meta-analysis of outcomes.

Attrition Bias in a U.S. Internet Survey of Alcohol Use Among College Freshmen

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About