1992
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199210000-00017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcome of Cardiac Transplant Recipients With a Positive Donor-Specific Crossmatch—preliminary Results With Plasmapheresis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other published plasmapheresis series (8,18), the number of sessions has varied from 3 to 19; our patients underwent a minimum of 7 daily sessions, and if the rejection episode had not resolved by then, daily sessions were continued until it did resolve. The maximum number of sessions applied was 19.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other published plasmapheresis series (8,18), the number of sessions has varied from 3 to 19; our patients underwent a minimum of 7 daily sessions, and if the rejection episode had not resolved by then, daily sessions were continued until it did resolve. The maximum number of sessions applied was 19.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…126,127 Plasma exchange has also been reported to facilitate transplantation across a positive crossmatch by decreasing the likelihood of subsequent allograft rejection. 127,128 There is little support for the use of plasma exchange as monotherapy for the management of AMR. Treatment with plasma exchange for the reduction of alloantibody levels has always been reported in combination with other immunomodulatory therapies.…”
Section: Intravenous Gamma Globulinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although preformed anti-donor antibodies can cause early heart transplant rejection and compromise patient survival (Singh et al, 1983;Ratkovec et al, 1992), pretransplant crossmatch is performed only occasionally in heart transplantation. The liver is less susceptible to antibody induced damage (Fung et al, 1987), although recent reports indicate that preformed antibodies do represent a higher risk for rejection (Takaya et al, 1992;Nikaein et al, 1994).…”
Section: Clinical Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%